Monthly Archive for August, 2008

Thousands of UK tourists trapped - Observer August 31 08

Andrew Drummond in Bangkok

Link to Observer article

Thousands of Britons were trapped in Thailand last night as mobs protesting against the country’s ‘corrupt’ government laid siege to airports in tourist hot spots. Some 15,000 people were turned away from the airport on the holiday island of Phuket after protesters from the People’s Alliance for Democracy (PAD) stormed the runway and terminals.

Stranded passengers had to carry their bags through cordons to a nearby road where they were forced to hail cabs to take them back to their resorts. The chaos has sparked concerns that thousands of children will now miss the start of the British school term.

The airports at Krabi, now rivalling Phuket as Thailand’s No 1 tourist spot, was also closed, as was the airport at Haad Yai in the south. Last night demonstrators were also heading for Surat Thani airport, around three hours north of Phuket. ‘We want to bring government corruption to the attention of the world,’ said a PAD spokesman.

Having spent their holiday cash, many tourists were wondering how they would get home and find accommodation in the interim. The Tourist Authority of Thailand has asked hoteliers to give stranded tourists discounted or free accommodation, but almost all those from Britain have lost connections on to London which they booked months in advance. Last night many tried to make their connections by bus, minibus and taxi in a 13- hour road trip to Bangkok, but PAD said they were also setting up road blocks on major roads into the capital.

They insisted however that they were not targeting tourists and the protests have remained largely peaceful, though further chaos is predicted. Thailand’s railway system is already 70 per cent out of action due to action by unions in support of the PAD demonstrations. Unions at the Electricity Generating Authority of Thailand, have threatened action against the national grid and the Thai Airlines union is threatening to join the protests.

The PAD began their massive demonstrations four days ago demanding the resignation of Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej and his cabinet. The group argues that corrupt politicians have been able to buy themselves into power.

PAD leaders claim that Samak and his cabinet intend to plunder the country, a charge which they brought against the former Premier Thaksin Shinawatra, now owner of Manchester City FC. The protesters are angry that Thaksin and his wife Pojaman were allowed to flee Thailand after she was jailed and he was charged with corruption.

As the government battles to restore its authority, arrest warrants for treason have been issued against the PAD leaders, who include media magnate Sondhi Limthongkul, former Bangkok governor Chamlong Srimuang, Pibhop Dhongchai, an academic, and labour leader Somsak Kosaisuk. However, police have so far been unable to serve the warrants.

After meeting King Bhumipol Adulyadej at his summer palace in Hua Hin, Samak insisted he would not back down. Bhumibol’s support is crucial. Although he is a constitutional monarch with no formal political role, he has repeatedly brought calm in times of turbulence during his 60 years on the throne.

‘I, the Prime Minister, have come to office in the righteous way and I won’t resign,’ Samak said. ‘I will not back down. I will rule this country and will lead it through all of the problems.’

He also defended himself against critics who say he should not have let protesters overrun Government House in Bangkok: ‘I have been very patient and have refrained from using force.’

But Samak’s position looks fragile. Army commander General Anupong Paochinda has rejected his request to declare a state of emergency, and the Chart Thai Party, a member of Samak’s six-party coalition, said it was ready to suggest the Prime Minister step down.

Last night thousands of protesters remained camped out at Government House, where leaders called for a million people to join their ranks and demand an end to Samak’s seven-month tenure. ‘The protest has already developed into a people’s revolution,’ said protest leader Sondhi Limthongkul. ‘I do believe that Samak is going to resign.

Sun, sea, sand…and sex - Scotland on Sunday August 25 08

Not by Andrew Drummond. But quotes him. An overview of touring child abusers and some of the cases Andrew Drummond has covered

Link to Scotland on Sunday article

Published Date: 24 August 2008
By Dani Garavelli
IN HEATHROW Airport, the atmosphere was tense. As the plane bound from Thailand touched down, police officers took up their positions, paparazzi photographers raised their cameras and curious bystanders moved in for a closer look.
Then the moment they had all been waiting for: journalists hollered and bulbs flashed as a gaunt Gary Glitter, aka Paul Gadd, stepped into the arrivals hall, smiling for all the world as if he were still a rock star being greeted by his fans.

The days when Glitter’s name evoked affection and nostalgia are long gone: years touring the world in search of underage sex have transformed him from ageing glam rocker to international pariah. The unrelenting publicity surrounding his release – as he bounced like a pinball from country to country looking for sanctuary – may have been unedifying, but it has served a purpose. It has drawn attention to a global phenomenon which produces hundreds of thousands of victims a year but very few convictions: sex tourism. More specifically, child sex tourism. In Heathrow on the day of Glitter’s arrival, it is likely some of the men in the departure lounge were jetting off on holiday with the express purpose of having sex with children.

Glitter is far from alone in using foreign countries as an outlet for proclivities that would not be tolerated at home. Every year, thousands of Britons living outwardly respectable lives travel to holiday resorts such as Pattaya in Thailand or Goa in India, known for their thriving sex industries, or to Vietnam, Cambodia or former Eastern Bloc countries such as the Czech Republic and Estonia, to buy sexual gratification. A proportion will be paedophiles looking for boys and girls to abuse far away from their domestic moral strictures. It is not difficult for tourists to find poverty-stricken children willing to spend a few hours in a cheap hotel room for the price of dinner.

A report from the International Labour Office in the late 1990s found that in countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines and Thailand, the “sex sector” accounted for anywhere between 2% and 14% of national income. Child sex tourism accounted for up to half of that revenue.

The impact on the children involved, many of whom are trafficked from other countries to meet demand, is enormous. US studies indicate that underage prostitutes serve between two and 30 clients per week. They live in constant fear of their pimps, their clients and the police and often suffer from STDs and TB.

Some of those who start out as sex tourists emigrate permanently so they can target vulnerable children all year round. Take the academic James Fraser Darling, from Edinburgh. The son of the famous naturalist Frank Fraser Darling, he took a cottage on Rawai beach on the southern tip of Phuket after getting a job as an English teacher on the island. Soon he started befriending gypsy boys on the beach, buying them school uniforms and books, before taking them to a nearby island to photograph and abuse them. He was jailed for 33 years in 1998, although he was released after serving just two.

Other paedophiles – like Glitter – have moved abroad after being convicted of child sex offences at home. According to campaign group Ecpat (End Child Prostitution, Pornography and Trafficking), poor record-keeping and the failure to share information between countries mean it is virtually impossible to gauge the scale of the problem.

According to the Foreign Office, 114 Britons were in detention in other countries in relation to child sex offences in the first quarter of this year, but since these statistics are based on those who asked for consular assistance, they don’t give the full picture. Ecpat director Christine Beddoe says one of the most alarming developments in recent years has been the number of British sex offenders getting involved with charity work or setting up orphanages abroad.

The Thai authorities believe Britons who engage in underage sex abroad can be split into two categories: those who are established paedophiles who come to Asia looking for children to target; and those who are opportunists who come looking for sex and think: “I’ve never had someone so young before, I’ll give that a try.”

With cheap air travel opening up previously remote parts of the globe, the internet allowing sex tours to be advertised and booked anonymously, and information-sharing between countries still inadequate, the trade is burgeoning. “Paedophiles will go to any lengths to get access to children,” says Beddoe. “There is not a region of the world which is unaffected by it.”

No place in the world has a worse international record for child sex tourism than Thailand. The country’s reputation for sleaze has its roots in the Vietnam War. Bars, nightclubs and massage parlours sprang up to accommodate American servicemen on leave. Soon the GIs were fraternising with Thai girls, often hiring “mistresses” to keep them company.

When the GIs left, the bars and brothels remained in Bangkok and in tourist areas such as Patpong and, perhaps most notoriously, Pattaya. An Ecpat report in 1994 observed: “For young men, Pattaya is a kind of macho theme park, with beer, motorbikes go-go bars, kickboxing, live sex shows, pool tables in English-style pubs and guaranteed access to dolly birds to posture with and have sex.” Pattaya caters for the gay community too – with dozens of bars, with names such as Boyz, Boyz, Boyz, where picking up a man for cash is virtually guaranteed.

Then there is the even seedier side – the trade in children, particularly young boys. In an infamous area called Sunee Plaza, they work in the bars or hang around in the streets outside waiting to be picked up by predatory farangs (Thai slang for tourists of European descent).

Writing on a gay website last year, a visitor to Pattaya described checking out of a hotel because he was disgusted by “all the grandfathers bringing back street kids into the room next door”. He went on: “Sunee Plaza… is a cesspool of underage boys and men looking to pick them up.”

Occasionally, police will raid the clubs and round up children. Earlier this year, a sweep of Sunee Plaza found 80 underage bar workers, many of them performing on stage in their underwear. But the trade goes on, often through fixers and middlemen, with the abuse taking place in gated houses with CCTV cameras outside to warn of approaching police.

Much of the attention following Gary Glitter’s return to the UK has focused on what more the UK should be doing to crack down on its travelling sex offenders (see panel], and last week Home Secretary Jacqui Smith promised new measures to keep paedophiles on a tighter leash. However, in Thailand in particular, much of the blame lies with the country’s own justice system. The British Government has paid for training exercises for Thai police officers, but the suspicion remains that many of those involved in the trade are people of influence – police officers themselves or members of the establishment. If arrests are made, money can still be used to buy off justice.

“Great play will be made of raids,” says investigative journalist Andrew Drummond. “Photographs will be taken and it will be all over the newspaper, but then the negotiations start. The quicker the offender agrees a financial settlement, the quicker his ordeal will be over.”

Even when the case reaches court, bail will often be set and paid, with the offender subsequently getting lost in the system. The few offenders who are convicted may be given ostentatiously heavy sentences, such as 40 years, but then let out after serving just one or two.

Perhaps the case that highlights the failings of the Thai justice system most clearly is that of elderly Briton Maurice Praill, known as ‘the ghost’. In the 1990s the infamous paedophile was arrested several times and released after “paying fines”. In 2001 he was convicted of the rape of two young girls, but was released on bail pending his appeal. When he lost his appeal he was released on bail again. Last year he was arrested for abusing two girls aged nine and 11 at his condominium, but within two weeks was out on bail of £8,000. Then, in March, he walked free from a police station in Pattaya after £6,500 bail was paid for the alleged sexual abuse of an eight-year-old boy.

In fact, the bail of suspected child sex offenders is paid so often, some campaigners are convinced a fighting fund has been set up to keep them out of jail.

Beddoe believes the weaknesses in other countries’ justice systems do not absolve the UK from doing its utmost to alleviate their plight. In a report published last week, Ecpat UK calls for foreign travel orders to be issued more frequently. And it wants foreign companies employing Britons to carry out the same criminal record checks we do here.

Most urgently, however, it wants to see bilateral agreements made with countries such as Thailand so British sex offenders like Glitter would automatically be returned to the UK with a chaperone after sentencing.

“Then, and only then,” Beddoe says, “will the UK send a strong message that we will not tolerate the sexual abuse of children – anywhere.”

What can Britain do?

Britons can be prosecuted in the UK for offences committed in another country, even if what they did is not considered a crime there – although only a handful of such cases have gone through the courts.

Those who are on the sex offenders’ register have to notify the authorities if they want to travel abroad for more than three days, and in some cases foreign travel orders can be issued to prevent them doing so.

The Child Exploitation and Online Protection Centre has an overseas tracker unit dedicated to trying to trace known sex offenders who have fled the country.

Last week, the Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, unveiled a series of additional proposals:

&149 Force sex offenders to tell police at an earlier stage of their plans to go overseas;

&149 Close the loophole which allows sex offenders not to inform police if they are going abroad for fewer than three days;

&149 Make it possible to issue Foreign Travel Orders where children under 18 rather than 16 are at risk;

&149 Extend Foreign Travel Orders from a maximum of six months to five years;

• Make it possible for those subject to blanket travel bans to have their passports confiscated.

 

Andrew Drummond the only reporter with Gary Glitter -Daily Mail August 21 08

 

 

REJECTED BY VIETNAM, THAILAND, HONG KONG, NOW POP PERVERT GLITTER AGREES TO RETURN TO BRITAIN

By Andrew Drummond and Sam Greenhill

 

Paedophile Gary Glitter has agreed to fly back to Britain after two days in international limbo as he was refused entry to Hong Kong and Thailand, according to Thai police.

Officers said the disgraced former pop star has finally agreed to board a flight back to London despite his attempts to avoid returning to his home country.

The paedophile and former pop star has agreed to return to Britain after being caught in a sting that resulted in him being served deportation papers in Hong Kong.

Thai police want him on the first available direct flight back to London. A space is being held for him on flight TG 901, which departs at 1.10am local time and lands at Heathrow Terminal 3 at 6am tomorrow.

Reluctant: Gary Glitter flying back to Thailand today. Police there say the convicted paedophile has now agreed to take a flight back to Britain

Reluctant: Gary Glitter flying back to Thailand today. Police there say the convicted paedophile has now agreed to take a flight back to Britain

The deal came after it emerged that Glitter had appealed to the Foreign Office to help him out of his travel deadlock.

But an airport source said he had fallen into a trap by boarding the plane to Hong Kong:

“Gary Glitter was allowed to fly to Hong Kong. It was a trap and he fell for it. He was given the deportation papers as soon as he touched down.

‘They can now legally make him get on that plane back to the UK, or put him in a detention centre.

‘Thai immigration police colluded with Hong Kong to make this happen as neither country wants him. Consular officials are speaking to him.”

A spokesman said: ‘It’s our understanding that he’s arrived in Bangkok. He will either try to go somewhere else or come back to the UK.’

Some 19 countries had refused the convicted paedophile entry and Thai officials had threatened to put him in a detention centre if he refused to leave for Britain.

The 64-year-old, travelling under his real name Paul Gadd, was said to be trying to book flights to Sri Lanka and Singapore this morning before accepting his fate.

With an estimated £5 million fortune, there were fears that he could bribe his way into a country and resume his pursuit of children.

The former singer appeared totally determined to avoid returning to the one country he will certainly be allowed into - Britain.

He was released from prison in Vietnam on Tuesday after serving a three-year jail term for abusing girls aged 11 and 12.

From there he was deported to Thailand, supposedly to board a flight from Bangkok back to Britain but on arrival, he refused to budge.

Last night it was suggested that an announcement by Home Secretary Jacqui Smith on restricting travel by paedophiles was behind this decision.

glitter

The sleeping creep: Glitter snoozes on a Thai Ariways flight to Hong Kong yesterday

After a farcical 20-hour standoff with immigration officials, he eventually took a Thai Airlines flight to Hong Kong.

Glitter had rebuffed all attempts to coax him aboard two London flights from Bangkok, and the Thais had made it clear he was not welcome to stay in their country, declaring him a ‘threat to domestic morality’.

During the confrontation, he was overheard saying: ‘I’ve been in jail three years. Now I want to do some shopping in Hong Kong.’

Once aboard Thai Airlines Flight TG602 to Hong Kong and settled into his business class seat, Glitter began issuing instructions to cabin staff, telling them: ‘I am quite famous and hard of hearing. Please can you arrange for an escort for me at the other end?’

He used an on-board phone to call a friend in Hong Kong, asking him to book accommodation in Wanchai - the city’s lively night club area. ‘Just leave any message with Thai airways ground staff. They will know how to contact me,’ he said.

The only reporter on the plane, Andrew Drummond, who was in the seat behind him, asked Glitter his plans and was told: ‘I am travelling to Hong Kong for medical treatment.’

gary

Stop right there: Gary Glitter arrives at Hong Kong airport where he is greeted by immigration officials

Drummond said: ‘On landing, Glitter left the plane after being met by Cathay Pacific staff and an immigration official.

‘He smiled as he was fast-tracked through the Diplomats and Airline Staff immigration point, but once out of sight the smile must have been wiped off his face.’

At least 19 countries have said they will refuse him entry.

Meanwhile, the Home Office denied reports it had blundered by issuing him a new passport last year, allowing him to roam the world.

A spokesman insisted his passport - number 761028553 - was in fact issued in 2002, four years before he was jailed in Vietnam.

The spokesman said: ‘There was no blunder. We do not enforce the return of sex offenders, and he was entitled to a passport.’

While Glitter, 64, was doing his utmost to avoid the UK, Home Secretary Miss Smith seemed determined to bring him home and keep him here.

She was accused at Westminster of trying to manage the news by waiting for a ‘celebrity pervert’ to promote her tough measures to curtail paedophiles’ rights to travel.

In fact, there were suspicions Miss Smith had actually triggered the Glitter farce by panicking him into refusing to board the flight to Britain.

 

Glitter

Please let me in: Glitter tries to persuade Chinese officials to let him into Hong Kong

While at Bangkok, he watched the BBC which was broadcasting that paedophiles would never be allowed to travel again.

Shadow Home Secretary Dominic Grieve, said: ‘Government policy timetable should not be dictated by the movements of a serial sex offender with a media profile.

‘This would be the crudest form of news management in an extremely sensitive area.’ 

jacqui smith

Embarrassment: Home Secretary Jacqui Smith

Miss Smith admitted that she had found it ‘ embarrassing’ that Glitter had not come home but said: ‘No paedophile is a celebrity, every paedophile needs to be controlled.’

The former star, who in his 1970s heyday sold 18million records and has a personal fortune of £5million, told reporters he was planning to write a book to ‘prove’ his innocence.

He said: ‘I should never have been in there. I was set up”.

Pictures Andrew Chant

Link to Daily Mail

Glitter skips his flight home - The Independent Aug 20 08

Glitter skips his flight home after jail release

Link to Independent story

By Mark Hughes and Andrew Drummond at Suvarnabhumi Airport, Bangkok
Wednesday, 20 August 2008

The convicted paedophile Gary Glitter made a hysterical but successful break for freedom last night as he was being deported from Vietnam to Britain after serving nearly three years in prison for child sex offences.

The former rock star, 64, managed to avoid boarding a flight to London during a stopover in Thailand after a series of confrontations involving British embassy officials, police and Thai immigration officers. He told them he was scared of the press, particularly the television crews expected to meet him in London.

Glitter, whose real name is Paul Gadd, collapsed in a bedroom at the Louis Tavern – within the territorial no-man’s land of Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi International Airport – and complained of heart problems, demanding to be taken to hospital. In the early hours of the morning Bangkok time, he was attended by a doctor on call at the airport, paying for his treatment in cash. Meetings were being held in the early hours involving Thai officials, British officials and child protection agencies to discuss his future.

The Government chose today – the day of Glitter’s expected arrival – to announce that it is increasing to five years the amount of time paedophiles can be banned from travelling abroad, among other measures to clamp down on sex tourism. The Home Secretary, Jacqui Smith, said of Glitter: “We need to control him and he will be, once he returns to this country. It certainly would be my view that with the sort of record that he’s got, he shouldn’t be travelling anywhere in the world.”

Glitter’s attempt to do just that began 12 hours after he was released from Thu Duc prison, 100 miles north of Ho Chi Minh City, where he served his sentence for abusing two girls, aged 10 and 11, in Vietnam. He was taken under police escort and accompanied by an official from the British consulate in Ho Ch Minh City to the airport, with his lawyer insisting he was returning to Britain.

He signed autographs for fellow passengers on the Thai Airways flight to Bangkok, but tried to avoid conversation. One passenger said: “He seemed fairly relaxed but tried to keep himself to himself. Some passengers started hassling him and asking questions, but he got moved away from them all.”

On arrival at Bangkok, it was clear that going to London was the last thing on Glitter’s mind. He was met at the aircraft by Thai immigration police and taken immediately to a VIP room.

Sudarat Sereewat, the secretary of Thailand’s Fight Against Child Exploitation group, said: “At first he asked to be allowed to enter to Thailand but he was refused. He said he had not committed any offence here but he was told he was not wanted.”

Unable to enter Thailand, Glitter then demanded to fly on to Singapore. Mr Sereewat added: “This situation is still far from clear. He has been told that he will be arrested if he attempts to enter Thailand.”

 

Gary Glitter tricked onto flight - The Times August 21 08

From Times Online August 21, 2008

Gary Glitter tricked on to flight back home

Andrew Drummond in Bangkok

The disgraced glam-rocker Gary Glitter has finally agreed to return home to Britain after falling for a trick by Thai police, with a little help from their colleagues in Hong Kong.

The 64-year-old convicted paedophile sat alone tonight on a bench seat in Bangkok’s Suvarnabhumi airport, cordoned off from the press in a transit area and waiting to be deported for the third time in three days.

Glitter, whose real name is Paul Francis Gadd, was thrown out of Vietnam on Tuesday after serving two years and three months for abusing two girls aged 10 and 11.

But his arrival in Bangkok from Ho Chi Minh City left Thai Immigration Police in a quandary.
 
They did not know the strong feelings his name conjured in Britain and, although they had been tipped off about his arrival, nobody had given them any official documents which they could use to further his deportation to London.

Officers knew he had been convicted in Vietnam, but the government there did not give Thai Airways any deportation documents – even though it insisted that Glitter travel coach class. He got himself upgraded as soon as he entered the plane and arrived in Bangkok as a person with status.

“I am a free man. I have served my time,” Glitter insisted, producing a document from his Vietnamese lawyer stating that he was a full member of society, purged of any crimes and free to travel where he wished.

He then demanded to change his London ticket for a ticket to Singapore. When he was told there were no flights at that time of night, he demanded overnight accommodation and installed himself in a transit area at the airport where weary passengers can book rooms by the hour.

As the minutes ticked away for TG901, his connecting flight to London, in stepped an officer of CEOP – Scotland Yard’s Child Exploitation and Online Protection unit – who said that Glitter should be returned to London forthwith. He then withdrew and booked him a room nearby, admitting that he was “out of his jurisdiction”. He had no papers to present which could validate a deportation.

Thai police duly turned up shortly after midnight to take him to the plane, but Glitter would not budge. He demanded attention from the British Embassy duty officer, who duly arrived in the form of Stephen Buckley, a member of the commercial section whose duty that night was to out-of-hour calls from Britons in life-or-death situations.

Glitter ranted about his rights. “I will need to call the Ambassador,” Mr Buckley said diplomatically.

The following morning, with the plane already gone, the British Embassy told Thai officials that they did not want to get involved, which left the Thais back at square one. Glitter slept through as the morning flights left to Hong Kong and Singapore, his destinations of choice. He did not surface until 11am and refused to leave his room until he was brought a ticket.

The Thai Airways midday flight left for London without him on board. Thai Immigration told Thai Airways to solve the problem because they had brought in a deported person without the right documentation.

Glitter was eventually invited to a 3pm meeting in the office of the head of the airport police. A solution could be reached, he was told, that could be agreed by all parties.

Singapore was ruled out, said police, “because they won’t even let you in there”.
 
When Glitter suggested Hong Kong there were quizzical looks and an officer was sent out to enquire.

“I’ve been in jail for nine years. Why can’t I go and do some shopping in Hong Kong,” said Glitter smiling. Everybody smiled back. Some laughed.

Within the hour Glitter was promised a ‘Press Free’ permit to Hong Kong, although he was advised to buy a return ticket anyway.

By 7pm Glitter was in seat 11B, a glass of champagne beside him and happily unaware that he had fallen into a trap. He planned to stay in a luxury hotel in Wanchai and used the phone on his arm rest to summon a friend to collect him at the airport.

But Thai Police informed Hong Kong Immigration that he was coming and they agreed on a plan. He was arrested on arrival.

By 1pm today Gary Glitter was back in Bangkok and, this time, Thai Airways brought the deportation papers they needed - issued by the Hong Kong police.

His fate was sealed and his farcical Asian odyssey had come to an end.

Tonight, Major General Phongdej Chaiprawat, of the Thai police, confirmed that Glitter had agreed to return home. Honouring his part of the deal, however, he refused to tell the press which flight the star would be on.

 Link to Times story

Pictures: Top: Glitter, aka, Paul Gadd tries to negotiate himself out of Hong Kong

Centre: Reading on the aircraft

Bottom: Cheerfully arriving in Hong Kong

All pictures by Andrew Chant

 

Glitter’s return prompts tighter sex offender laws - The Times Aug 20 08

From The Times

August 20, 2008

Gary Glitter’s return prompts tighter sex offender laws

Richard Ford, Jack Malvern and Andrew Drummond in Bangkok
 
Child sex offenders are to face tighter travel restrictions after it emerged that existing laws would not curb Gary Glitter’s movements after he returns to Britain.

The measures to be announced by the Home Office today come as the 1970s glam-rock star heads for London after serving a 33-month sentence in Vietnam for molesting two girls.

Glitter, 64, was released yesterday and deported. He flew to Thailand but managed to avoid boarding his planned flight to Britain last night, complaining of fatigue and dizziness. He rented one of the small rooms at Bangkok airport that are available for passengers who want to rest and declared: “I’m not going back to London. You can’t make me. I’ve done my time. I’m a free man.”

The singer, who was told that he would be arrested if he tried to enter Thailand and whose requests to fly to Singapore or Hong Kong were denied, was travelling on a passport issued by the British consulate in Ho Chi Minh City last November. He has the same rights as any British citizen to travel to any country that does not require a visa.

Under the Home Office’s proposed measures, child sex offenders would have to renew their passport annually and new rules would make it easier for police to seek an order restricting an offender’s movements. The ministry also wants to extend the length of time — currently six months — that child sex offenders can be barred from travelling abroad.

Jacqui Smith, the Home Secretary, said: “I want to see anyone who poses a threat to our children dealt with as firmly as possible. I’ve spoken to child protection experts and the police and they have told me that these changes will further restrict the ability of child sex offenders to harm children both here and overseas.”

She said that it was her view that with his criminal record, Glitter, who, in his heyday, earned £800,000 a year, should not be travelling anywhere in the world.

The proposals came after the disclosure that police were powerless to impose a sexual offences prevention order on Glitter on his return to Britain. At present police require recent evidence that a person is at risk of re-offending. In future there will be no timescale on the evidence.

Registered sex offenders will also have to give more than the present seven days’ notice of their intention to travel abroad, making it easier for police to seek an order to ban them from going overseas and for their passports to be confiscated. The measures require legislation, so they will not be in place when Glitter returns.

The singer was driven from jail to Ho Chi Minh City airport via the British consulate and put on a flight to Bangkok. As he boarded his lawyer, Le Thanh Kinh, said: “Everything is OK. He is happy to be going home. He was in a good mood.”

On his arrival in Bangkok Glitter was met by Thai immigration police. He said: “I am not getting back on the plane with all the press there and I’m not going to the first-class lounge to be hassled by them. And I’m not going to London. I’ve done my time. I’m a free man.”

British Embassy officials were called in. Thai immigration officials declined to force Glitter back on the plane and the British police officer escorting him admitted that he had no jurisdiction to make him board the aircraft. As the officials pondered the situation, flight TG901 pulled away from the gate with Glitter still at the airport.

The singer, whose real name is Paul Gadd, was due to be met by police at Heathrow and told that he was being placed on the sex offenders’ register. He will join 30,000 people on the register and will be required to give police his name, date of birth, home address and national insurance number. He will be kept under the highest level of surveillance and be visited weekly by police and probation staff. If he breaks the terms of his registration he could face a prison sentence of up to five years.

Off the air

— Gary Glitter is thought to receive up to £50,000 a year from royalties and performance fees

— Glitter was enjoying a revival until he was charged in 1997 and had expected to appear in a Spice Girls film

— He used to earn about £100,000 a year from the National Football League in America, which played his Rock and Roll parts one and two after touchdowns. They dropped the songs after his conviction

Source: Times database

Link to the Times story:

British jailed for adultery to fly home - Mail on Sunday Aug 17 08

Link to Mail on Sunday article

From Andrew Drummond, Bangkok 
16th August 2008

Pictures by Andrew Chant

A British man who faced a seven-year prison sentence in the Philippines for adultery is being allowed to return to the UK with his girlfriend and baby this week.

David Scott, 37, has had his application for partner Cynthia Delfino to accompany him granted by the Home Office on humanitarian grounds.


The couple’s daughter Janina has been given British citizenship following her parents’ ordeal, which began when they were arrested and flung into a squalid cell in Manila when Cynthia was eight months pregnant.

They were charged with adultery, which is illegal in the strictly Catholic Philippines, despite Cynthia having separated from her husband.

After four days the couple were bailed and they fled to live in a jungle and derelict houses before Janina, now seven months old, was born in a tiny clinic.

David, from Swindon, Wiltshire - who met Cynthia on the internet in 2006 - paid £12,000 in legal fees and bribes to get them to Thailand.

After the long and emotional journey, they picked up Cynthia’s visa from the British embassy in Bangkok last week.

David said: ‘It’s been a long fight having to pay bribes everywhere I go. But every time I look at my daughter I just know it was worth everything.’

Cynthia said: ‘I am so relieved. I am a little scared about going to Britain, but everybody is so kind.’

 

Coming home at lastFrom Andrew Drummond,
Koh Samet, Thailand
Saturday August 16 08
In the sea  off the Thai island of Koh Samet David Scott takes his first ever dip with is new born baby and Filipina wife.
He has been in the tropics for nine months but has not even seen so much as a swimming pool in an ordeal which began with his arrest and jailing in the Philippines for adultery and a threatened  sentence of seven years.
But yesterday David Scott, 37, his girlfriend Cynthia, 28, and baby Janina, seven months finally found time to celebrate after learning that the Home Office had granted them permission on humanitarian grounds for the whole family to return to Britain.
David and Cynthia are on the run after escaping from Philippines Police. A court official in Coolocan, Manila, confirmed last week that a warrant had been issued for their arrest or adultery.
 This week they will be flying back to Swindon, Wilts, where Scott will introduce his new born baby to his grandmother.
Said David: “If it had not been for you guys (the Mail on Sunday) and my local M.P. Anne Snelgrove, I have no idea where I would be now, but probably in jail or worse. I cannot thank you enough.”
David Scott, 37, from Swindon, Wilts., spent last New Year in jail in Manila, after he was arrested with 8 month pregnant Cynthia Delfino,  during a night-time swoop by Philippines police and officers of the National Bureau of Investigation.
Accompanying the police was Cynthia’s Filipino husband Noriel Delfino, who was demanding the couple be jailed for the maximum seven years in the Philippines for adultery unless they paid him the equivalent of £7,000.
There is no divorce in the Philippines, a strictly Catholic country, but rich families can seek costly annulments on the grounds of the mental incapacity of one of the partners.
The couple  were thrown into a  police cell and that’s when how they spent last New Year. They even had to bribe police to be allowed to share a cell.
The couple fled while on bail and were forced to live in the jungle, derelict houses, and finally a room provided by friends, before their baby girl Janina was born in secret in a tiny clinic south of Manila.
All in all David Scott had to legal fees and bribes over £12,000 using his savings and finally cash sent by his mum and friends in Britain, to pay for documentation for Janina and his wife and get smuggle them out of the country.
Although the warrant was out for their arrest, they were able to board a flight to Bangkok, Thailand.
“The Immigration policeman took  my last £25,” said David.
Back in Thailand journalists chipped in and provide food and accommodation for the family for four months while David attempted the hardest - part to get them all home to Britain.
With the help of local M.P. Anne Snelgrove, Mr. Scott was able to get British citizenship for baby Janina in Bangkok a month ago, and this week an official from the British Embassy in Bangkok  informed David the Cynthia’s application to travel with her baby to England was granted on humanitarian grounds.
On the holiday island of Koh Samet,  150 miles south east of Bangkok David Scott said:  “When I flew to the Philippines to visit Cynthia for the birth of our baby her husband had already agreed to go through an annulment.  But I walked into a trap.  It’s been a long fight having to pay bribes every where I go.  But every time I look at my daughter I just know it was worth everything.
“I have learned a lot from this trip. The biggest lesson of all is that one is not automatically going to get help or even just advice from a British Embassy if one gets into trouble. You are very much on your own.
“The first advice I got from an Embassy official in Manila was that legally Janina was not my baby and I should leave the country without her. 
(Technically as there is no divorce in the Philippines the government would recognise Janina as being the daughter of Noriel Delfino).
“That’s not the sort of advice one forgets.  Then when I got to Bangkok they would not even let me and Janina into the Embassy – until my M.P. called them – all because we had ticked the wrong box on a visa form.
(Cynthia has been given a visa even though technically she is still married to Noriel Delfino and has known David under the statutory two years. Thus they were not even allowed to join the visa queue).
Said Cynthia:  “I am so relieved. I am a little scared about going to Britain but  everybody has been so kind so far.”

 

 

 

Bar girl and the expat: a killing foretold - Observer 17 Aug 08

Link to Observer story

Every year hundreds of Britons leave the UK to marry Thai brides. The perils of such liaisons were revealed last week when retired engineer Ian Beeston was murdered by his wife and her lover. Ian MacKinnon and Andrew Drummond in Suwannaphum investigate a ruthless marriage market in which money can buy beauty but not necessarily love.

 Ian MacKinnon and Andrew Drummond

The Observer, Sunday August 17 2008

Andrew Herrington, a retired Birmingham lorry driver who now lives in Thailand, lowered his voice and turned to his companions: ‘Well, you know, he married a bar girl. What did he expect?’

Sitting on the ground floor of his home - a two-storey house squatting in a rice paddy in Isan, north-east Thailand - Herrington, aged 51, was talking about his friend and neighbour, Ian Beeston, who was found murdered last weekend after predicting that his Thai wife would kill him.

Beeston, 69, a retired design engineer, had been beaten and stabbed in his house - police say he took seven hours to die. His wife, Wacheerawan, 42, and her Thai lover, Somchit Janong, 48, confessed and have been charged with murder. In bizarre and macabre fashion, Janong even re-enacted for police and photographers the manner in which he had clubbed Beeston to death.

This was no isolated romance that culminated in a tragedy. The British embassy in Bangkok processes the wedding documents of up to 70 couples each week. The requests are almost exclusively from older British men - among 860,000 UK tourists each year - hoping to marry younger Thai women. But for any British man hoping to follow in Beeston’s footsteps and build a new better life in Thailand, his death was a stark reminder of how badly things can go wrong.

Three of the group of worried farangs - the Thai term for foreigners - who had gathered in Isan, have invested a hefty chunk of their life’s savings building houses nearby on the fringes of Suwannaphum village, deep in Thailand’s poorest province, Roi Et. Beeston’s house, which swallowed up all of his £250,000 retirement nest egg, was described locally as ‘palatial’. Unsurprisingly, in the wake of the killing, a siege mentality has taken hold.

‘Wanna’ was indeed a bar girl, a prostitute. She met Beeston in a bar in Beach Road, Soi 2, in Pattaya, the garish beach resort in southern Thailand, when he was still coming to the country on holiday. The resort is notorious for go-go and hostess bars with a ’sin city’ reputation that surpasses that of Bangkok. Eventually, his marriage having fallen apart, Beeston took early retirement from his job at the Ford motor plant in Dagenham, Essex, and moved to Thailand. In 1999 he married Wanna and paid for her two grown-up children to be put through university.

The good life hit the buffers when he discovered Wanna had secretly sold his Suwannaphum property. As foreigners are barred from owning land in Thailand, he had put everything in her name. All his savings from working as a design engineer, first at Perkins and then at Ford, had gone. Worse, the new owners of his house were agitating to move in. Four months ago a furious Beeston banished Wanna to a corrugated shack in the back garden. Friends feared then that he had signed his own death warrant.

In a letter left with lawyers, Beeston predicted his own grisly fate. ‘It is just a matter of time now,’ he wrote. ‘I am in real fear for my own life.’

Beeston’s romance, like so many others involving Western men escaping loneliness at home, began with a stroll down one of the hundreds of neon-lit strips in Thailand’s tourist-friendly sex quarters. The ratio of male tourists to Thai women is almost two to one. Walk down Bangkok’s Soi Cowboy or Patpong any evening and it is easy to see how masculine fantasy can take flight. Ageing, unprepossessing foreign men are fawned over by lithe young Thai women wearing broad smiles and revealing clothes. The prospective clients are beckoned through curtained doorways to a dimly lit world where bar girls dance suggestively on a tiny stage and strip.

Others chat up the punters in rudimentary English. The price of all this attention is just the cost of a drink for the girl, perhaps a tip. The often unspoken element is that the girl will go back and spend the night at his hotel. Cash is rarely mentioned, and there is no unseemly haggling, but the going rate is little more than a ‘present’ of £20.

‘[The men] are often not the most handsome of all, they are usually in the latter years of their life, they are bald, unattractive and quite lonely in their own little society,’ writes Thai anthropologist Dr Yos Santasombat in Hello My Big Big Honey!, an anthology of love letters penned to Bangkok bar girls. ‘When they come to Patpong, they’re struck with girls who are all over them.’

The appeal of easy, cheap sex is evident the next morning. The same men hold hands with their bar girls skipping down the pavements of Bangkok’s tourist haunts. ‘Often they extend their relationship for a number of days or weeks or even years,’ writes Yos. ‘Sometimes the farang himself ends up spending the entire vacation with one girl and sometimes comes back. Sometimes she becomes his mistress or even a wife.’

Romance with a Westerner in such circumstances can come perilously close to a game of mutual exploitation. Nearly all of the girls have flocked to the cities and resorts to escape their own prison: an impoverished existence in Thailand’s rural expanses, whereas a night’s takings from the city bar could sustain a family for a month. From Isan’s desperately poor, rice farming villages, where hunger is the norm, the bars of Bangkok or Pattaya are a welcome escape. For girls with little education they provide an opportunity to shine and have the honour of providing for their families by sending new-found riches back home.

‘They do it because it’s an easy life,’ said John Burdett, a British lawyer-turned-novelist who has interviewed hundreds of bar girls for books such as Bangkok Haunts. ‘You don’t want to be a subsistence rice farmer. It’s very, very hard. Village life’s claustrophobic. Bar girl work isn’t dirty. It’s not strenuous. They don’t have dozens of partners; maybe one or two a week. The rest of the time they’re getting men to buy drinks and existing on tips. In the village there’s a kind of omertà, where no one talks about it. But they send money home to care for people, so they’ve big status.

‘A bar girl in her early or mid-twenties has a 10-year window of opportunity to get out of poverty,’ said Burdett. ‘So if she spends time with a guy she is using up her chances. She sees that as an investment and she’s entitled to something in return. The car and the house may be in her name. In the West we’ve lost our intuitive understanding of how poverty shapes thinking. So, if after 10 years together the foreigner decides to move out, leaving her with little to show for it, that’s a problem. She’s lost face and that’s terribly important. Her image has been damaged and it might even lead people to kill.’

Stephen Treharne Jones, 63, (left) was a former neighbour of Beeston. Jones met Lamyai, then 32, in a Pattaya bar and sought to ‘rescue’ her and send her home to Isan. ‘When I met my wife, Lamyai , she had nothing,’ said Jones. ‘I paid her out of a sex bar in Pattaya and told her to go home. When I visited her home she was living in a room with her two children. There was no bathroom or toilet facilities, no doors, no tiles, no electricity, just a mattress and blankets on the floor. So I bought a big home for both of us and bought the land off her relatives.’

Jones’s world collapsed when he asked his wife to sell a piece of land he had bought. Lamyai refused, saying it was impossible. Only when he went with a lawyer to the land registry did he discover he never owned it. He bought it from Lamyai’s family, but allowed them to keep it in their names because of foreign ownership prohibitions. When challenged, Lamyai threw him out of their luxury villa in Kalasin, an hour from Suwannaphum. Penniless, he scuttled back to King’s Lynn, Norfolk, two months ago. He now lives there in sheltered accommodation.

‘Looking back now, I know my Thai wife had set me up from day one,’ said Jones last week. ‘In Kalasin I know of three other foreigners who were kicked out by their wives after they completed property purchases. They say there’s no fool like an old fool. But I did genuinely love Lamyai. I was sold a dream, I guess. A quiet life in the country where food and drink was cheap, the women attentive and the weather warm. But that’s not the reality. The reality is that one becomes a captive.’

Lamyai (right) has a very different account of the breakdown in relations. ‘If Stephen had been a good husband I would not have asked him to leave,’ she said. ‘But when he argued he called me a thief and a prostitute. We were quite happy for four years, even though he spent a lot of time going out drinking with his farang friends in the area. Stephen had a house he could have lived in all his life if he respected me as his wife, but at the end I was just his servant.’

As his own marriage became a bitter property dispute, Beeston saw trouble coming. Exiled to the garden shed, his wife had installed her lover, Janong, and they kept Beeston a virtual prisoner in his own home with taunts and attacks.

In a letter to his lawyers, Beeston told how his wife had started a money lending business - lending his money - and had paid off local police so she could run an illegal lottery. ‘My wife threatened me with a gun,’ he said in the letter, detailing a series of attacks on his house involving ’stones, lumps of wood, fireworks and even a tin of paint’. The house was also frequently burgled, he said.

Like so many Britons and other expatriates living in rural Thailand who are unable to converse in Thai, it appears Beeston may have been the unwitting victim of a sting his wife had been waiting for years to bring off. According to his friends, the whole town, even the police chief, knew but nobody said anything. ‘I thought she loved me, but she only wanted my money after all,’ Beeston had told his Australian neighbour, Bill Lamb.

‘He told me he thought his wife was about to kill him,’ said Lamb. ‘My feeling is that Ian had been paying for Wanna’s daughters from a previous marriage to go to university. This year they both graduated. I just don’t think he was needed any more. She had it all. To be honest - the life of a foreigner isn’t worth much around here.’

Back in Herrington’s Suwannaphum house, fists were clenched as the group discussed a fitting revenge for the perpetrators of the callous act. The palpable sentiment was: ‘It’s them or us.’ But the bitter consensus was also that after all the publicity had died down Beeston’s wife would be granted bail and freed. ‘She’s got the money, and with money cases just get dropped,’ said Herrington.

Then the conversation turned to the future and who was ‘next for the bullet’. They agree they know the identity of the marked man. He lives about 20 miles away and is having some major problems with his Thai wife. ‘Yep,’ they chorus, ‘for sure.’

About this articleClose Bar girl and the expat: a Thailand killing foretold
This article appeared in the Observer on Sunday August 17 2008 on p8 of the News section. It was last updated at 00:02 on August 17 2008.

Mr. Swirly jailed for child abuse - The Times Aug 16 08

Link to The Times edit

From Andrew Drummond

Bangok Criminal Court 

Photo:Andrew Chant                                                                      

Christopher Neil caught on film and now dubbed ‘Mr.Swirly’ was jailed in Thailand today – after a judge said the photographic evidence against him was conclusive.
Neil, 32, was jailed was initially jailed for six years six months but the sentence was halved to three years three months because he did not contest the case.
Canadian Neil, 32, from Maple Ridge, British Columbia, smiled as he was led away in shackles from the court in his  brown Thai prison uniform.
 But earlier in the dock his jaw dropped as the woman judge read out  the sentence stating that although his face was not in the pictures in this particular case, ‘it is quite clear from the evidence of the boy that part of your body was ’.
He had admitted three charges, abusing a minor, separating a minor from his parents, and taking obscene photographs.
Before leaving the court he was heard to say: “I’m zero. I’m nothing. What can I do?”
The parents of the victim had put in a claim for compensation of 300,000 Thai baht - about £5000.
The court ruled that the figure was too high and settled terms at 60,000 baht just under £1000.
At an earlier hearing Neil said he had no money to pay compensation. If he does not he may have to serve extra time in lieu.
The child in question at 11 was the older of two boys – the other is aged nine – he has been charged with abusing in Thailand.  He has pleaded not guilty in the other case.
The court had heard that Neil photographed the 11-yr-old masturbating him.
Christopher Neil, who had sought and got teaching jobs in schools in Thailand and Korea became the subject of an international manhunt after German police unravelled pornographic pictures which he had put on the internet.
The head of the man in the pictures was distorted into a swirl – but the Bundespolizei  were able to clear up the distortion in the picture and ‘before and after images’  were then transmitted around the world by Interpol and Neil was tagged ‘Mr. Swirly’.
He was arrested in Thailand last October in the provincial town of Nakorn Ratchasima where he was living with a ‘ladyboy’ (transsexual) friend.  A signal from his mobile phone gave him away.
At the time Wongkot Manarin, Deputy Police Commissioner in Bangkok said: “From the pictures on the internet there is evidence that he had sexual relations with between 5 and 7 boys under ten years told, and one girl under ten.”
The second case continues.  On completion of his sentence Neil will be deported to Canada.

Police to meet Gary Glitter in London - The Times Aug 14 08

Link to The Times story

Link to ‘Tracking Down Gary Glitter’

From  Andrew Drummond,

Bangkok

 

Gary Glitter, the former rock star who was jailed for three years for abusing children in Vietnam would be deported back to Britain next, his lawyer said yesterday.

The statement appeared to contradict an earlier statement by lawyer Le Than Kinh that Glitter would be unaccompanied and free to go anywhere after leaving Vietnam.

But it is understood Glitter, real name Paul Francis Gadd, has been only provided with a one way travel document back to Britain, since his passport expired a year ago.

On his return to Britain it is understood that Gadd will be put on the paedophile register before being allowed to travel abroad again. 

He has indicated in an interview with a Vietnamese journalist that he needed to seek medical and dental treatment in Britain as a matter of priority, although in that interview he said he would like to go to Singapore or Hong Kong where he had friends.

The Vietnamese Foreign Affairs department has politely declined work visas for foreign journalists intending to cover his release and asked that they respect Gadd’s wishes.

Le Than Kinh said last week that the fallen star, who had a cult following with songs such as ‘Leader of the Gang’ , would be escorted directly onto an aircraft by police and with a British official from the Consulate in Ho Chi Minh City.

He confirmed yesterday: “Police booked his ticket from Ho Chi Minh City to London and I have already paid for the ticket on his behalf.”

Glitter was arrested in the southern province of Baria-Vung Tau after journalists from a Sunday newspaper spotted and photographed him with young girls there.

A subsequent police investigation resulted in four charges of ‘lewdness with children’ aged 11 and 12, being brought against him.

An investigation into child rape was dropped after the parents of the two victims demanded US$10,000 and US$5,000 respectively.

Lawyer Le Than Kinh negotiated the compensation down to US$2000 each and the families then petitioned the People’s Court  to  stop the case in order  ‘to avoid further damage to the girls’ families’ honour and to the privacy of the victims.

Since the offences the girls have been returned to the care of their parents, and of two older girls  who procured the children for Gadd, one was now married and another has been sentenced and released from custody at  the Baria-Vung Tau Social Labour Centre, a rehabilitation unit.

When Gadd was sentenced to three years in prison the Chief Prosecutor of the People’s Procuracy of Baria-Vung Tau noted that in 1999 he had been ‘taken into police custody for two months by British police on a charge of storage of forbidden sexual photographs in a laptop’ and that in 2003 he was expelled by police from Cambodia.

After he was sentenced officers from Scotland Yard visited Paul Gadd in prison in Vietnam and examined the hard disk of his computer which contained images of children involved in sexual activity.  The case had not been proceeded with in Vietnam because Gadd claimed in his defence that  he had borrowed the computer from a friend and there was no evidence that he intended to ‘widely propagate’ the material.

It is understood there is no plan to prosecute him in Britain for these offences.

Pictures: Andrew Chant

 

 

 

 

Jungle Brit gets Home Office permission to bring family home -Aug 14 08

Jungle Brit gets permission to fly home with Filipina and baby

From Andrew Drummond, Bangkok, Wednesday August 14

Pictures: Andrew Chant

 

A Briton who fled to the jungle in the Philippines after being told he faced seven years in jail there for adultery has been given leave to return to England with his girlfriend and seven month old baby.


David Scott, 37, from Swindon, Wilts., spent last New Year in jail in Manila, after he was arrested with his 8 month pregnant Filipina girlfriend Cynthia Delfino, 28, during a night-time swoop by Philippines police and officers of the National Bureau of Investigation.
Accompanying the police was Cynthia’s Filipino husband Noriel Delfino, who said David, was demanding the couple be jailed for the maximum seven years in the Philippines for adultery unless they paid him the equivalent of £7,000.
There is no divorce in the Philippines, a strictly Catholic country, but rich families can seek costly annulments on the grounds of the mental incapacity of one of the partners.
The couple fled while on bail and were forced to live in the jungle, derelict houses, and finally a room provided by friends, before their baby girl Janina was born in a tiny clinic south of Manila.
A warrant was issued for their arrest but by paying bribes they were able to board a flight to Bangkok, Thailand.
With the help of local M.P. Anne Snelgrove, Mr. Scott was able to get British citizenship for baby Janina in Bangkok a month ago, and early today an official from the British Embassy in Bangkok  informed David the Cynthia’s application to travel with her baby to England was granted on humanitarian grounds.
In Bangkok David Scott said today: “Obviously we are both delighted.  It’s been a nine month ordeal. We would like to thank our M.P. and journalists and everybody who helped us fight to get our baby home to Britain.


“When I flew to the Philippines to visit Cynthia for the birth of our baby her husband had already agreed to go through an annulment.  But I walked into a trap.  It’s been a long fight having to pay bribes every where I go.  But every time I look at my daughter I just know it was worth everything.”
Said Cynthia:  “I am so relieved. When the Embassy called this morning I just knew it was going to be good news. I am a little scared about going to Britain but  everybody has been so kind so far.”

Footnote: The following email was sent later by David Scott

Andrew Drummond and Andrew Chant saved us when Embassy could not help

The Thaksin debate. Did he jump or was he pushed?

Was Thaksin Shinawatra deliberately allowed to leave?

From Andrew Drummond

Request: Times Sport.

Monday 11th August 2008

 

Thaksin Shinawatra’s decision to flee to Britain was not only predicted but almost invited and today only his staunchest supporters seemed genuinely surprised in Thailand.

Two weeks ago on July 29th both he and his wife Pojaman had applied to the courts to travel not only to Beijing for the Olympics but also to Britain for the start of the football season.

They had been granted permission only to travel to Beijing after which the courts would consider their British trip.

No sooner had they left than the Bangkok press predicted that they would not return.  This was immediately vehemently denied at the weekend by people representing Thaksin saying not only would Thaksin and his wife return to Thailand but also giving the flight number and arrival time from Beijing.

A crowd of cheery supporters waited in vain at the airport.

Pojaman had already been convicted of a massive tax fraud and although she had been granted bail and could delay any imposition of sentence for years while on appeal, there was no appeal for the cases the couple were about to face.

Thaksin and his wife were due today to return to the Supreme Court in Bangkok in Bangkok to face the first in a series of other corruption charges.  They were accused of corruptly buying government land at a knock down price in the centre of Bangkok,  while Thaksin was in power, something akin to Gordon Brown ordering the acquisition of 16 acres of Whitehall for personal development.

And in this case three of their lawyers have already been jailed for trying to bribe a judge.

Thaksin is also due to face other corruption charges.  One is that he brokered a deal with the Burmese military junta enabling them to get very cheap credit from the Thai government Export Import Bank – provided they invested  in business with his Shin Communications corporation.

He is also accused of improperly running a government lottery.

“He was given the chance to leave. His permanent departure would bring an end to a lot of trouble in Thailand. He has massive support but also a section of the population is very angry at what he has done.  They even suspect than on his recent trip he smuggled more money out,”  a former Thai diplomatic official  told me yesterday, before rushing off to join an anti-Thaksin demo.

“This is a Thai solution.  But it’s not a good one.“

Last weekend it was reported that Pojaman boarded a flight to Beijing with nine cases, if so its of course rather a lot for  such an Olympic opening ceremony, now matter how smart one wants to look.

In affect even though Thaksin has massive amounts of money frozen in Thailand nobody really knows his real wealth.  If there is one thing he is good at it is moving his assets in and out of countries and banks. He has been acquitted once of concealing his assets, which he claimed was a genuine mistake.  Another  such charge is in the pipeline.

At the moment he is playing the ‘democracy’ card and he is citing Britain and a wonderful example of such. 

Sweet talk?  Opponents say that particular card was only dealt him when he was ousted in a military coup in September 2006.

Previous to that he had publicly stated  that western styled democracy was not the answer for a country like Thailand and when he was criticised at in the United Nations over misleading the world when he claimed that Thailand did not have bird flu he famously retorted: “The United Nations is not my father.”

Opponents also claim that he was not so concerned about justice when hundreds of innocent people, if not the 2,500 quoted by Human Rights organisation, were injudicially killed in the ‘War against Drugs’ which he initiated in 2003.  Nobody went through the courts for those offences perhaps because its a racing certainty that the police were the major offenders.

At any rate Thaksin’s hasty, or long planned departure, believe what you will, was good for the Thai Stock market which rallied on hearing the news of his departure.

It may also put an end to daily demonstrations against him throughout Thailand by the other ’champions’ of democracy the ‘People’s Alliance for Democracy’

At the moment however Thaksin Shinawatra probably needs Manchester City as much as the club needs his money.  It is a major conduit of his cult of his personality to the rural people of Thailand, from where his major support comes.

And without the fame and exposure City gives him he could just fade into the background completely as just another oriental politician.  There are no shortage of politicians in Thailand in the past,  who have allegedly robbed the country and then had to spend a considerable time in exile – until they are forgiven, of their crimes forgotten.

Thaksin is not expected to return to Thailand in the near future.  As one of his biographers, British academic Chris Baker, noted in Bangkok. “ He has defamed the court. So he has gone for good.”

Judges here are not addressed as ‘My Lord’  but when lawyers address them they usually end the sentence with the equivalent of ‘I am merely dust under your feet’.

The fact is that the judiciary is much the same as when Thaksin was in power . And he made full use of the judiciary to suppress his enemies.  Although the investigations against him were done by committees set up by the military rulers who ousted  him it was the judges who accepted the cases against him as worthy for trial.  Hoisted by his own petard?  We’ll have to leave it to other refs.

But the British government is going  to be hard pressed to support him even though it disapproved of the coup. When Brits are in the mire in Thailand, often claiming they have been framed by Thai police, the standard operating proceduce from the British government is a rather muted: ‘We will not interfere in the judicial process of another country’.   Sauce for the goose?

British pensioner awaited his own murder armed with a tazer - Daily Mail -Daily Telegraph - Daily Express

British pensioner killed in Thailand predicted his own death - Daily Telegraph edit

British man murdered by Thai bride and her lover after he predicted his own death - Daily Mail edit

Link to SUN

Link to SKY TV News

 

From Andrew  Drummond
Suwannaphum, Thailand- September 11 08

Photographs: Andrew Chant
A retired British design engineer predicted his own murder and sat helplessly in his tropical ‘palace’ waiting for it to happen.

Friends said today they armed 69-yr-old Ian Beeston with a tazer gun to protect himself. But it was not enough.
Last Saturday they found body his body. The pensioner who worked at Perkins and Ford’s Dagenham had been beaten and stabbed to death. Police said it took him seven hours to die.
Today Beeston’s wife and her Thai lover were arrested and charged with the murder as horrified onlookers ,shocked at the callousness of the deed,  jeered  and shouted ‘hia’ (Monitor lizard) – a strong Thai insult.


(Crowds outside Beeston’s home await the murder reconstruction)

Neill James a consular official of the British Embassy in Bangkok who attended the murder scene in the north eastern Thai province of Roi-Et called on local police for a transparent enquiry, said local police.

(Ian Beeston and his wife present water heaters to local police)

Beeston had predicted his own death in writing. He wrote a letter saying ‘It is just a matter of time now. I am in real fear for my own life. I need things to proceed quickly”.  He left the letter with lawyers.
Trouble started just four months ago when Beeston, married nine years to his 42-yr-old Thai wife, Wacheerawan, nicknamed ‘Wanna’ discovered that she had cashed in all the property he had bought in Thailand at a local bank.


He had invested all his life savings in over an acre of property and built his marital home, a guesthouse and a restaurant near a village called Suwannaphum, meaning ‘Golden Land’.  Thai newspapers this week described him home (above) as ‘ palatial’. 
But under Thai law, as foreigners cannot own property he had put it in his wife’s name.
“I thought she loved me but she just wanted my cash,” penniless divorcee Beeston , who arrived in Thailand with £350,000 told friends at the time. He then asked his wife to leave the marital home and live in a shack with corrugated iron roof nearby. (below)

 


And he began selling all moveable objects in the house and restaurant piece by piece to survive until he could legally get the funds to return home.
“It was like he has signed his own death warrant,” said neighbour Andrew Herrington, 51, a retired HGV driver from Sheldon, Birmingham.
“His wife (pictured below right) lived behind the main house with her Thai boyfriend. Every time we went to visit she would come out and scream and order us away. ‘This is my house. This is my land’, she would shout.

“I was due to meet Ian on Sunday. We had to meet on the main road near his village, because his wife would create a fuss if any westerners came. But he never turned up.  I was very suspicious.
“Ian knew that he was going to be murdered. He had already complained that while he was away she had put something inside a beer in his fridge.
“He had felt ill. So he sent the beer away for analysis to a local hospital. He was awaiting the results.
“But it was an open secret in the area that Ian was going to be murdered.
“When she arrived in the village she took her husband bearing gifts to all the police and local dignitaries.  But she had a secret police lover too.
“When I recently went home to Birmingham a policeman told me ‘ Perhaps your friend will not be alive when you come back’.
“So when I went to his house on Sunday and saw his car was there and the house locked up,  I knew then his time had come.  His wife came out shouting at me and my wife to go away. We decided to call the police.
“When they came they found his badly beaten body. I identified him.  Only the week before he had been at my house to collect a box of Mars chocolate bars.  He did not like the ones made in Asia.
“Ian was a nice and charming man, always helping others. He helped me with the wiring in my house and he designed my stairs, but he would not take a penny.  But secretly he was broke and he had nowhere to go once his home had been taken away from him.”
Another neighbour Australian Bill Lamb, from Woolagong, nr Sydney said: “Ian was a lovely chap. But whenever we visited his wife would come out from behind the house and shout at us.  She complained to the village chief to keep us away.
“Ian was helping me with some welding. He was a jack of all trade. He told us all he was going to be murdered, and quite frankly we believed him, and thought so too.
“Friends had brought him a stun gun, a tazer, to use to protect himself.  We wanted him to go home to England but he was spending his last pennies trying to get his property back.  He was due in court today.
“For the last three months he had been a prisoner in his own house.  We have been bringing him food, but he has been living on mashed potatoes.
“The grass around his house has grown because his wife has chased the gardeners away. He was a very tidy man.”
Police Captain Patapong Patniboon of Suwannaphum Police said: “Ian Beeston’s wife and a Thai friend from Petchabun Province, Somchit Janong, 48, have both been arrested for her murder. We have assured the British Embassy that the investigation will be thorough.”


Yesterday Province, Somchit re-enacted the crime saying he did it for ‘Wanna’.
A British Embassy official said that attempts were being made to trace Beeston’s grown up children, whom had moved abroad, and his ex-wife.
*Three years ago Briton Toby Charnaud, a gentleman farmer aged 42, was beaten to death barbecued and his body fed to the tigers in Kaeng Krajan national park in Thailand after he divorced his Thai wife and removed her from his will.  She was later charged and convicted with other relatives.

 

Gary Glitter to roam free - Daily Mail Aug 7 08

Link to Daily Mail

Link to The SUN

Link to Daily Express

 

From Andrew Drummond
Bangkok
August 6 2008

Disgraced former rock star Gary Glitter will be free to roam the world at will without registering as a paedophile the day he leaves jail in Vietnam, his lawyer said today.

There will be no restrictions placed on Glitter, real name Paul Francis Gadd, from the moment he steps on an aircraft at Ho Chi Minh International airport, said Le Thanh Kinh.

“His ticket has been bought but I am not free to say where he is going. That is confidential.  He will be escorted from the Duc Thu prison by Vietnamese police and a member from the British Consul in Ho Chi Minh straight to the door of the aircraft.

“Once he is on the aircraft he is a free man. He will not be accompanied,” added the lawyer. “He has served his sentence”.

Glitter, who is about to complete a three year jail sentence for sexually abusing under aged girls in the province of Vung Tau, Vietnam, has a choice of  regional flights to Hong Kong, Singapore, Kuala Lumpur, Kaohsiung in Southern Taiwan, or the Gulf States, Phnom Penh, or Bangkok.

He has been blacklisted as undesireable from Cambodia but the blacklist has never been tested. 

He can connect to London via Singapore, Bangkok, or Hong Kong, though the route through Thailand is shortest.

Sudarat Sereewat Secretary General of  ‘Fight Against Child Exploitation’ in Thailand said. The authorities are aware of Gary Glitter.  But he has not been convicted of an offence in Thailand so I am not sure what can be done except to keep him under surveillance if he comes here.”

ends

Wife of Premier League club boss jailed - jail boss fired - Daily Mail

Wife of Premier League club boss jailed for three years on tax evasion

Daily Mail

By Andrew Drummond
Last updated at 2:02 PM on 31st July 2008

Comments (5)  Add to My Stories
The wife of Manchester City Football Club owner and former Thai Premier Thaksin Shinawatra was sentenced to three years jail for cheating her country out of millions in a massive tax fraud today.

But then she was released immediately on bail and is expecting to be leaving soon with her husband for the Beijing Olympics.

Pojaman Shinawatra is unexpected to do any real time in jail in the near future. Dressed in a pale blue suit and a string of pearls, she still looked shocked as the verdict was read.
The appeal process could take over eight years if the case goes to the Supreme Court.  The defendants had ‘lied, cheated, and conspired to evade taxes, which is regarded as a serious crime,’ the judge said at the Criminal Court in Bangkok.

 
Convicted: Thailand’s deposed prime minister Thaksin Shinawatra (L) and his wife Pojaman (R) arrive at the Court in Bangkok today

‘The defendants are high-profile and wealthy citizens,’ the judge added, remarking that Pojaman’s husband ‘was the leader of the country and she is obligated to pay taxes as a model for society.’

Pojaman, her brother and secretary were convicted of evading the equivalent of over £10million in taxes in 1997 through a complicated transfer of shares in the family’s flagship communications business Shin Corporation that involved placing stocks in the name of one of the family’s maids.

Pojaman, 51, was accused of conspiring together with her brother Bhanapot Damapong and her secretary.

Her brother, also received a two-year jail sentence. The secretary, who played a lesser supporting role, was sentenced to two years. 
Thaksin’s spokesman, Pongthep Thepkanjana said: “Thaksin is not disheartened. They respect the court ruling but it is not the end. We will fight until the end.”
In fact it is only the beginning of s series of cases now hitting the courts which have been in the pipeline for two years.

Thailand’s Supreme Court decided this week to put Thaksin on trial for corruptly offering the Burmese military junta a low interest loan from the Thai government’s Export-Import Bank in a deal to benefit his family’s satellite and broadband business.

Both he and Pojaman are also currently on trial for corruptly acquiring land in the centre of Bangkok from a Thai government department at a third of its market price, something akin to Gordon Brown ordering his government to hand over 13 acres of Whitehall.

In another case Thaksin Shinawatra is also accused of initiating a government lottery, the proceeds of which were not properly accounted. As these cases are being heard in the Supreme Court there is no appeal.

With houses in Hong Kong and the U.K. and billons of dollars offshore many people in Thailand have expressed the view that they do not think Thaksin Shinawatra will come back from the Olympics.

But if he does, they say, he is already prepared.

They point to the fact that in an unusual move a recent Cabinet resolution essentially replaced The Director General of Thailand’s Prisons, with the former Director General, whom Thaksin appointed.

The outgoing Director-General Wanchai Roujanavong is an authority on international crime and apparently corrupt politicians.

His book ‘Organised Crime in Thailand’ details how politicians play a major part in organised crime in Thailand, how they avoid tax, buy votes, and to a certain extent control the courts, while at the same time playing the role of benefactor to the people.

He said: ‘I expected to be here for another year. But I am a civil servant I must go where I am sent.”‘