Monday, January 20, 2014

Monday, January 20, 2014
11

I'm in a country where I am being told that fascists demonstrators are on the streets fighting to bring an end to democracy and are apparently blowing themselves up in the process. 

It maybe that the swingometer is slowing pointing away from this theory and people are beginning to realise that the great Thai heist maybe coming to an end.

Voranai Vanajika excelled himself in the Bangkok Post but I think a lot of foreign correspondents are still tied up with thoughts of a red revolution - when in fact the people in the country should actually have quite a lot in common with people in the city. On the net its all been jackboots and little moustaches.


Voranai
Indeed it is fair to say that Thaksin did what governments should have done a long time ago. But it is becoming clearer to many now, what seems to have been startlingly obvious to others for some time, that the motives of Thaksin Shinawatra were not based on altruism.

Nor it appears were the motives of the Democrats for years.

If Thai complacency has been stirred who are we to object.

But while journalists have been following the lead of the BBC’s Jonathan Head who asked Democrat leader Abhisit Vejjajiva ‘Are you not ashamed’ (being the leader of the Democratic Party denying democracy), was very deferential with Yingluck Shinawatra, and then flew up to Isaan to film tearful rural folk saying: ‘We love Thaksin’, the big news organisations may I feel soon have to start adjusting their tone.

The Bangkok Post is reporting a shift in opinion in the north - perhaps related to the rice frauds.

Journalists may have to do a Glenda Slagg reverse ferret. Geddit.

(I have included the last sentence because a Frenchman has written in to say he does not understand my English. So you need to Google Glenda Slagg and reverse ferret)

But let's wait and see. Even the best laid schemes o' mice an' men gang aft agley in Thailand.

Here’s a link to Voranai’s piece today – if you have not read it. All Thais have to admit what they have done wrong, he says.

And below is Vanina Sucharitkul's answer to a rather shallow American senator who wrote to Obama to save democracy in Thailand. Oi vey.  First the Senator's letter.





17 January 2014

Dear Mr. President,
I am writing in response to Congressman Michael R. Turner's letter to you yesterday, urging you to publically voice opposition to the anti-government movement and support the election on 2 February 2014.  With all due respect, Congressman Turner's letter is misguided and shows a lack of understanding of the Thai political crisis. 
 
As a U.S. trained lawyer, and citizen of the U.S. and Thailand, I am pro-democracy.  Indeed, I have often volunteered for voters' assistance groups to inform Americans on voting registration, necessary documents for voting, and finding the right precinct to ensure that their votes do get counted. 
The anti-government protestors are also pro-democracy.  The movement is not to rid Thailand of democracy.  It is to rid Thailand of the most tyrannical and dictatorial regime in history.  Throughout history, many dictators have been democratically elected.
Saddam Hussein received 100% of the votes.  Hugo Chavez, whom you publically called authoritarian, was also elected by the majority.
 
The Thaksin authoritarian government, elected through vote-rigging, proved to be the most corrupt and the gravest human rights violator.  In order to fully appreciate the current political crisis, one must examine the telecommunications Tycoon' legacy.  To name a few examples of Thaksin's egregious conducts: 
In February 2003, Thaksin launched a "war on drugs" campaign resulting in 2,800 extrajudicial killing in the span of three months.   
In 2007, official investigations concluded that more than half of those executed had no connections with drugs.  The UN Human Rights Committee raised serious concerns yet perpetrators were never prosecuted. 
In 2004, Thaksin's security forces shot, suffocated or crushed to death 85 southern protestors in what is known as the Tak Bai massacre.  Human Rights Watch has condemned this atrocity and urged independent criminal investigation but again, to no avail. 
 According to Amnesty International, 18 human rights defenders were either assassinated or disappeared. 
Due to Thaksin's censorship and intimidation of the press, human rights violations remained unreported and any dissent was silenced.    
In an attempt to circumvent conflict of interest laws, Thaksin illegally transferred billions of baht in assets to his maids and drivers, without their knowledge. 
Thaksin aided his wife to purchase government land at a reduced rate of 1/3 in violation of the law prohibiting political leaders from engaging in business dealings with the government. Thaksin was consequently sentenced to two years in prison but fled the country and never served his sentence. 
Thaksin approved a US $127 million low-interest government loan to Myanmar's military-run government to purchase satellite services from his telecommunications business. 
During his tenure as prime minister, Thaksin sold his stakes in telecoms giant Shin Corp to Temasek holding, evading taxes worth $16.3 million.  
Thaksin's countless measures to benefit his telecommunications business prompted the Supreme Court to unanimously find him guilty of 4 counts of policy corruption and order seizure of $1.4 billion of his frozen $2.3-billion fortune. 
These are just examples of the myriad ways in which Thaksin abused and robbed this country.  Although in self-imposed exile, Thaksin continues to run Thailand and implement the policy of corruption through his sister.   
In a guised attempt to foster reconciliation, the current Thaksin regime passed the Amnesty Bill, designed to pardon protestors from all sides for engaging in political expression.  At 4:25 am on a Friday night, the Thaksin-controlled parliament passed the final version of the bill that would now pardon all politicians ever charged or convicted of corruption since the coup.   
The revised bill also provided for the return of assets seized.  To state the obvious, this law was passed solely to pave way for Thaksin's return as a free man with all his wealth restored. 
In a ploy to control both the parliament and the senate, Thaksin's current government attempted to amend the senate structure and bar appointed senators who are professionals from all sectors.  Eliminating this system would result in Thaksin's party controlling the legislative branch without any checks and balances.   
The Amnesty Bill or any other laws to enable Thaksin's corruption can then easily pass.  Although the Constitutional Court struck down the senate-restructuring measure, Thaksin's government openly declared that it would defy the court's decision.  
It is this blatant systematic policy of corruption and abuse of power solely for the benefit of Thaksin that fueled Thai citizens to stand up and say, enough is enough.  The protestors want democracy.  But first, Thaksin's dictatorship must be eradicated.
Over a decade of being under Thaksin's regime, one thing is clear.  Our current democratic system has failed us.  
 
It has allowed for an authoritarian regime to usurp power and strip the nation's wealth.  When a system accepts voter fraud and places corrupt politicians above the law, citizens must question and rise up against this broken system.  The citizens are calling for reform.  
 A true democracy with transparency, accountability, and most importantly, balance of power.  
We want democracy.  And it is through this civil disobedience that we will achieve it. 
Sincerely,
Vanina Sucharitkul
cc: Congressman Michael R. Turner

11 comments:

  1. The thing Thai people must accept is Thaksin is a product of the Thai system. He started out as a police officer before he went into business. When faced with doing business like everyone else he failed. It was only when he entered into dodgy relationships with certain politicians that he was able to secure his telecommunications monopoly. From there his move into politics was inevitable as he had to protect his interests.

    We all remember when he got off the charges of hiding all those billions in his servants names and it wasn't hard to figure out who the judge was who was on his side. As long as people can be bought off and there is no equality in the justice system, Thailand is doomed to remain a third world country.

    Voranai is probably one of the few journalists who tells it as it is. Reform is impossible because it would require people give up the gravy train of corruption that greases the whole civil service. Both sides of Thai politics are totally corrupt. Thaksin just knew how to play the corruption game better than others. You must also remember where he was educated, Texas, the home of the likes of Bush Sen. and Jnr.

    ReplyDelete
  2. How many of you actually talk to Thais about what is going on and discuss their views? The extreme opinions expressed in Bangkok Post and The Nation on the one hand and McGregor Marshall on the other are not representative of the majority of Thais.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Weapon, with all due respect I beg to differ. "Thaksin just knew how to play the corruption game better". Not really, or else he would still be here. He made many serious mistakes while "playing the game" One of them was not paying taxes over an absurd high amount, legal or illegal. Many consider Thaksin a screwed intelligent person, I think he is stupid. This act did not go well with him having to disappeare in the end. A similar situation but different :-) is the illegal situation at 04.00 AM a while ago. This did not go well as well with disastrous consequences as we see now. two times in a relatively short period with the same family? Misjudging the whole of the country? Orchestrated by the guy in Dubai? Thaksin plays the game wrong, he became a victim.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Well Thaksin is a megalomaniac and he has certainly overplayed his hand with the amnesty bill. Some of his corruption was perhaps just slightly more sophisticated rather than better than some of the old timers like Banharn. I always ask people this. Thaksin comes from the most powerful family in Chiang Mai and is ethnic Chinese, do people really think he has never had anything to do with what Chiang Mai is most famous for? Many of the old Chinese who are cashed up made their money in the opium, loan sharking and gambling trades. Thaksin's father Lert was long suspected of having links to the latter trade. The real power behind Thaksin was his wife and the Damapong's who are also very rich and influential.

      I was in Thailand when Prem was PM, then Chatichai and Banharn etc. I think corruption grew exponentially under Thaksin. The only PM that I ever thought had one ounce of integrity was Chuan Leepai and he was criticised and abused for being too poor.

      Delete
  4. I'm confused , Voranai Vanajika is the Post's commentator ( pictured ) who is known for his concise and un-partisan articles. Vanina Sucharitkul is the signed author of the very partisan letter above. What is the connection apart from a common first initial and that both were educated in the USA?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. No connection Christy. Just two pieces written about the same time - worth looking at.

      Delete
  5. I'm hoping Andrew Marshall pops along for another bun fight! Lol....

    ReplyDelete
  6. Voranai's articles are a beam of light in the encircling gloom - and beautifully written as well as carefully thought out. Wish I could write that well...

    The voice of reason doesn't seem to have visited Thailand too frequently over the last decades, and what I can't understand is why most commentators can't see the truth - that both Suthep and Thaksin are cast from the same mold. Power Over All is the end game, rather than personal power benefiting all.

    I'm grieving for this country and its people.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Does anybody really think Suthep could be doing what he is doing without support from the establishment?
    He is just the front man.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I agree, Weapon. But it's amazing how many people, including foreign journalists reporting from overseas, point that out.

      Delete
  8. The American's probably want Thaksin in power because they've got more dirt on him and can control him to get what they want, like their 'free trade agreement.' You only have to look at the publications and people overseas who support him. He's just another stooge like Marcos. When his usefulness is over he'll be thrown to the dogs like Saddam, Gadaffi and others.

    ReplyDelete