Archive for the 'General News' Category

British property tycoon paid out to blackmailer - Irish Daily Mail, March 6th 08

From Andrew Drummond, Bangkok,
March 5th 2008

An Irish computer hacker who posed on the internet as a young Thai woman to successfully blackmail a British millionaire in Bangkok was arrested by police yesterday in Northern Thailand.

Computer hacker David Gerard Murphy, 42, from Dublin, was seized by police, after he decided 40,000 Euros was not enough for his silence and he went back for more than double that amount.

20080305murphyd02  2

Murphy had emailed the businessman in his office in Bangkok’s business district of Silom posing as a young Thai woman who wanted to introduce herself to him and wished to send a video.

When the businessman accepted and downloaded the video, a virus was introduced which scooped up all his private business correspondence into Murphy’s computer.

The next day Murphy contacted the businessmen threatening to pass on his secrets unless he paid up 2 million Thai baht – 41,688 Euros. The businessman paid up, said Lt.General Virachom Boontaw in Chiang Mai, where Murphy was arrested.

Police are keeping the victim’s name and his secrets confidential, but Murphy would have got away with it had he not got greedy, said Thai police.

Having spent the cash on girls and other entertainment he went back for more, said Police Lt. General Boontaw.

“The first payment was made two years ago. According to the warrant of arrest at the beginning of this month he tried to blackmail the businessman again ordering him to send a further 5 million baht (104,330 Euros).  But this time the businessman went to the police.”

Police arrested the Thai holder of a bank account to which the money was to be sent in the town of Nakorn Sawan, just over halfway halfway between Bangkok and Chiang Mai.

Enquiries led to Chiang Mai where Murphy was found renting a room in the Baan Thai Guest House with a young Thai woman called Surin, aged 23.

Murphy has refused to comment on the matter but admitted he knew something about the businessman in question.

His girlfriend Surin told the police: “I have known him for six months but he never did any work.  He used to sit all day in internet cafes.”

Added Lt. General Boontaw: “We believe he has been financing his good times in Thailand blackmailing businessmen here. That has paid for his drinks, his girlfriend.

“He told us that he graduated from University in computer studies but he has used his knowledge to become a hacker.”

Islam v Sky Kingdom ‘All hail the teapot!’ March 4 2008

Teapot woman sent to jail in Malaysia

From Andrew Drummond
March 4th

 A member of a persecuted sect nicknamed ‘The Teapot Cult’ yesterday began a two year jail sentence in Malaysia for renouncing Islam yesterday.

The 57-yr-old woman Kamariah Ali was sentenced in an Islamic Shariah court after she refused to respond to a judge’s Islamic greeting.Sky Kingdom teapot3
Muhammad Abdullah a judge of the Islamic Shariah High Court in Kuala Terengganu jailing 57-yr-old Kamariah Ali said the court not convinced that the accused had repented and was willing to abandon any teachings contrary to Islam. 

 Left: ‘All hail the teapot’ - Sky News 2005
“The accused also failed to respond when I greeted her by saying Assalamualaikum  (‘Peace be upon you’)  during the start of the court proceedings. This shows that Kamariah has not repented,”  The Malayian ‘Star’ newspaper reported. 
It was the woman’s second jail sentence for ‘apostasy’ – abandoning her religion. She was sentenced despite the fact that the Malaysian Constitution guarantees freedom of worship.
Kamariah had been charged with ‘apostasy’ – denouncing her religion in an Islamic court which are given separate powers to deal with Islamic only cases.
Kamariah is a member of the ‘Sky Kingdom’ religious sect whose most notable symbol is a cream coloured teapot the size of a two storey house which stood at the commune’s headquarters in Terengganu. The teapot is said to symbolise the ‘purity of water and love pouring from heaven’.
The sect’s leader Ariffin Mohamed, also known as Ayah Pin, who has gone into hiding,  is believed by his followers to be the reincarnation of Jesus, Buddha, Muhammad and Shiva. The sect has members in Britain, USA and Australia and practices religious tolerance and ecumenical dialogue.
The Sky Kingdom’s supporters website carried the following message: “We are the supporters and friends to Ayah Pin. We respect his ideology to educate moslem people in Malaysia and the world. To teach Moslems to respect the people’s right and not to take the law into their own hands like Talibans..We hate Talibans.”
The commune was first attacked by vigilantes then torn down by the Malaysian government in 2005 and most of the followers were arrested. They were charged with being part of a deviant sect, or of renouncing the Islamic faith.
Pending her appeal Kamariah Ali has started serving her sentence in Pengkalan Chepa prison in Kelantan.
 

Why won’t the Foreign Office help? - Mail On Sunday February 24 2008

British man facing jail over his ‘adultery’ with a Filipino woman asks: ‘Why won’t the Foreign Office help us?’

By ANDREW DRUMMOND -

Manila
 
Last updated at 00:23am on 24th February 2008
 

When David Scott fell in love with a beautiful Filipino woman, he embraced the opportunity to escape his humdrum existence as a machine operator in Swindon and begin a new life in an exotic land.

But within weeks of leaving his friends and family to join his girlfriend in her native country, his dream of happiness has vanished - to be replaced by a nightmare he could never have anticipated.
After fathering a child with Cynthia Delfino, whose separation from her estranged husband was not complete, the 35-year-old became an unwitting victim of the Philippines’ harsh legal system.
He and 29-year-old Cynthia were charged with adultery and thrown into a rat-infested prison for four days. 
Terrified: David and Cynthia must pay her estranged husband £7,000 but have no money
And despite David having spent his life-savings trying to ensure freedom for the couple and their newborn baby, they have now had to go into hiding as the country’s police search for them.

David  Cynthia and baby Janina
Picture: Andrew Chant

If they are caught, David faces seven years in jail and having his daughter taken away from him permanently.
“I can’t believe this has happened to me,” he said at his hideaway in a squalid suburb of the Philippines capital Manila, after almost two months on the run.
“I have done nothing wrong and yet I have found myself in this horrendous situation. I am begging the British Government to help.”
David’s ordeal began when Cynthia became pregnant with his child before she had officially separated. Adultery is illegal in the Philippines, where it can incur a seven-year jail sentence.
Now, just weeks after the birth of baby Janina, Cynthia’s estranged husband - who is considered the child’s legal father in the Philippines - is determined to see the pair imprisoned if they do not pay him £7,000 compensation.
If they are jailed, he will be the one bringing up their baby daughter, a prospect David says breaks his heart. Now only cash, which David and Cynthia do not have, or diplomatic pressure, can save them from jail. However, the Foreign and Commonwealth Office say they cannot interfere with Philippine law.
David said: “Nobody is going to take my daughter away from me. It will be over my dead body. Under British law my daughter is mine. Why can’t the Foreign Office help?”
Cynthia, a psychology graduate from Manila’s Colegio de San Juan de Letran, met David over the internet in November 2006.
At the time, she had been separated from her husband, Noriel Delfino, for a year and was working as a supervisor at the Emirates Palace Hotel in Abu Dhabi.
David, then living in Swindon, was working on a contract for the Ministry of Defence, cutting armour for use on military vehicles in Iraq.
They began talking on the website Camfrog.com and soon realised their attraction for one another.
“We used a webcam, so I knew how beautiful she was, and from the start we were direct and honest with each other,” said David.
“We would spend hours talking about every subject under the sun - we just clicked.” Cynthia said: “I was honest with David. I said I was married and had two children, a boy and a girl, but was separated from my husband and we were going through a marriage annulment. Divorce is illegal in the Philippines.
“My husband had ordered me to go to work in the Middle East and every month I sent back just about all my salary, 20,000 pesos (£300), to pay for him and the children.
“But he never told me what he did with the money and it was clear our marriage was not going to work.
“We talked about annulling our marriage and he even sent me an email saying he wanted the annulment to get done as soon as possible.”
The couple’s first face-to-face meeting took place last February at Manila’s Ninoy Aquino International airport, as she flew in from the Middle East and David flew in from London. “Shortly after I met Cynthia, I knew our relationship was going to work,” said David.

 In hiding David Cynthia and baby Janina
Hiding: David, Cynthia and newborn Janina outside Manila

Picture: Andrew Chant
“We had a wonderful time in the mountains of Luzon near an extinct volcano at a place called Laguna, but after six weeks I had to rush home when I heard my father was dying.
“But we had already agreed we would both save our money to pay for the annulment and plan our own marriage. Then, out of the blue, Cynthia rang crying to say she was pregnant. I said: ‘Why are you crying? That is great news.’
“I was as happy as the happiest expectant dad. I told her to get on with the annulment.”
Cynthia said: “My husband agreed on the grounds of ‘psychological incapacity’, the only grounds for annulment in the Philippines. He even said he wanted to get it over with as quickly as possible.”
But then in September at a matrimonial court in Manila, where Cynthia was due to give evidence, lawyers from her husband suddenly withdrew from the case.
“They were preparing charges against me,” said Cynthia.
Unknown to the couple, Noriel had discovered a photograph of Cynthia and David they had posted on a website similar to Facebook.
Enraged, he then began proceedings to have them arrested for adultery.
David said: “I rushed out in November with all my savings to be with Cynthia for the last part of her pregnancy.
“Everything seemed to be going wrong but I wanted to be there with my wife when my baby was born.
“Our real nightmare began on December 30 when police and immigration officials raided the house I had rented in the suburb of Caloocan. It was about 10pm and there were all these people outside shouting.
“There were local police, immigration officials and officers of the National Bureau of Investigation, their version of the FBI. We were taken along to the local police station and thrown into a cell. They said they were charging us with adultery and Cynthia’s husband was demanding £7,000 in compensation.
“The cell was not big enough to lie down in, so we sat there hunched for three nights and four days.
“It was crawling with cockroaches and other insects, stank of urine and there was my girlfriend eight months pregnant and in great discomfort.
“They wanted to separate us, so we had to pay 500 pesos, about £8, each night to different officers to allow us to be together.
“Every night, though, a different policeman would take it in turns outside our cell flicking the light on and off. We pretended to be asleep.
“They took us out during the day to question Cynthia and get my details and fingerprints. They let us wash from a bucket; Cynthia’s relatives brought us soap and toothpaste.
“Eventually, on the fourth day, a lawyer came on the recommendation of the British Embassy, who got us bail.
“The bail was about 12,000 pesos each - £150. But we had to pay 100,000 pesos, £1,250, to somebody under the table to actually get the bail.”
The couple were ordered to appear in court on April 12 to hear their fate.
Since then, they have been on the run, fearing that Cynthia’s husband was trying to get their bail revoked.
They have moved from shack to rented room in the squalor of suburban Manila as they desperately try to find a solution to their problems.
David’s savings have long since run out and the couple are now surviving on charity from friends and family.
Yesterday, David’s distraught mother sent her son £100, without which he says they would not be able to afford food.
He said: “We have changed our address twice. I rarely go out. I am the only European here, so if I go out, I stand out like a sore thumb.
“I sit and watch from the window. We have received messages that the police are looking for us, so I am always looking out of the window.”
When their daughter was born, the couple’s difficult circumstances clouded what was supposed to be a joyful occasion.
“We could not go to one of the big hospitals as they pass on their records quickly to the authorities. Instead, we had to go to a small clinic where Cynthia was the only in-patient.
“It was a harrowing time. Janina was born two weeks early by caesarean section on January 17 and weighed just over 6lb.
“She had an irregular heartbeat which caused us days of worrying. In addition, Cynthia lost so much blood after the operation that she had to have a transfusion. Thankfully, due to the generosity and kindness of some very good-hearted Filipino people, we have been looked after very well since Janina’s birth and she is now doing just fine.
“But all our money has gone, to lawyers, to police, to hospital bills and on living expenses. My mum rang me today to say she has just sent me £100.
“That’s so unfair. It’s me who should be looking after my mum. She is 62 and disabled and gets very little in the way of pension. She has been scraping round friends and relatives.
“I hope one day I can tell my daughter Janina of this nightmare, of what her mum and I went through. But if the full course of Philippines law is followed, Cynthia and I will be in jail and Delfino will have my daughter.
“We have begged the embassy for help. I thought the child of a British father had the right to British citizenship. But the embassy official allocated to my case is Filipino and just quotes Filipino law at me, saying it’s not my child.”
At this point Cynthia began to cry, saying: “Sometimes I just want to give up fighting.
“I feel so depressed. Let them take me to jail. I have done nothing to be ashamed of. I love David and our daughter.”
David’s mother Ann has received a letter from Anne Snelgrove, Labour MPfor South Swindon who has promised her ‘full support’.
The MP said: “The Nationality Directorate says that the child will automatically have British nationality if David is named on the birth certificate as the child’s father.”
But she added: “Until this case is settled in the Philippines under their law, there is little we can do to progress the matter.”
By that time David and Cynthia expect to be in jail.
Philippines lawyer and women’s and children’s rights activist Katrina Legarda warned: “I have to tell you the worst first. David Scott is in great danger if he stays here. The fact that he has a baby proves the adultery.
“The baby is not legally his. A child born in a marriage is considered legitimate to the marriage only.
“Legally the baby belongs to her Filipino husband. Frankly put, he does not have a child. He should go home.”
Ms Legarda continued: “As it stands, it seems the only way out is for David to pay the husband. No matter how bad the husband might be, even if the couple are separated, the law still applies.
“I know this sounds unfair but this is the law and whenever we try to change it there is an outcry from the religious groups.
“This should not really be happening. We tried over 20 years ago to introduce a divorce law, but those who supported it were condemned in the pulpits of Catholic churches all over the country as people who would go to Hell.
“For David and Cynthia, and others like them, it is a very sad situation.”
A Foreign Office spokesman said: “We are aware of the case and are providing consular assistance to Mr Scott and his family, but cannot comment further due to data protection.”

‘Fair’ probe into Canadian’s death - The Nation - February 20 2008

 Fair Probe into Canadian’s Death

 Leo Del Pinto charcoal 1 2The government has promised a transparent investigation into the fatal shooting of Canadian Leo del Pinto after a probe by the National Human Rights Commission revealed key differences from the police investigation.
The NHRC published a report at the weekend on its inquiry into the shooting of del Pinto and Carly Reisig in Pai last month. It contradicted the police investigation on several major points, notably that three shots were fired and not one as police have claimed.
The Thai government gave assurances to Canadian authorities via its embassy in Bangkok.
Human Rights Commis-sioner Surasee Kosolnavin said: “We understand the Thai government has given assurances now to the Canadian government that an investigation will be conducted with the utmost transparency.
“The families of the victims can be assured we will represent the human rights issue in court as joint prosecutors.”
While the NHRC’s call for an independent probe was predicted, what has not been revealed so far is the police claim that “one bullet entered both Carly Reisig and the deceased”.
A commission panel discovered that three bullets were fired, each hitting vital targets - something which pathologists knew from an early stage. But this was not mentioned when police gunman Sergeant Uthai Dechawiwat was released without bail.
Reisig, 24, from Chilliwack in British Columbia, was shot first below her left breast. Del Pinto, also 24, from Calgary in Alberta, was then shot in the abdomen and head. The final bullet entered his check and lodged under his armpit, according to forensic evidence and witnesses interviewed by the NHRC.Carly08 Protected witnesses give evidence  to HR Commis
Top pathologist Dr Pornthip Rojanasunan, who gave evidence to the NHRC panel, has already publicly stated that the fatal bullet which killed del Pinto was fired into his skull in a downwards direction. This was backed by witness testimony.
The commission’s report stated: “When Dr Pornthip consulted with doctors who conducted the post-mortem on Leo del Pinto at Chiang Mai University, she gave the opinion that the characteristics of the shooting should not make it a case of the gun going off accidentally.”

Picture above right: Anonymous witnesses testify to NHRC and DSI in Bangkok
Lt-Colonel Sombat Panya, in charge of the police investigation in Pai, claimed Uthai fired accidentally as Leo towered over him.
Annapong Sutsukhon, secretary-general of the Human Rights Commission, called for the investigation to be handed to the Department of Special Investigation, Thailand’s FBI.
He said: “It is thus credible that there has been violation of human rights by state officers in the justice system, a matter in which the Canadian Embassy and the media has a special interest.”
Del Pinto and Reisig were gunned down on January 6 outside a restaurant in Pai in the far North. It was the first of a series of shootings in which Canadians were involved in Thailand.

Andrew Drummond
Special to The Nation

Thai Police Under Fire - Calgary Herald with copy supplied by Andrew Drummond through Splash Agency LA

Pai murder- The Human Rights Report Feb 17 2008 + ThaiVisa.com controversy

 Leo Del Pinto charcoal 1

Urgent: No. Sor Mor 0001/335 

Offfice of the National Human Rights Commission of

Thailand  Pathumwan,

Bangkok 10330

Re: Report of investigation into the case of Mr Leo Delpinto and Ms Carly Reisig who were shot by an officer from Pai Police Station To: Director General, Department of Special Investigation Encl.: Report of investigation by National Human Rights Commission As the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) has taken up the case of Mr Leo Delpinto and Ms Carly Reisig, Canadian tourists who were shot by the police in Pai, which caused the death of Leo Delpinto at the scene of the incident, while Miss Carly Reisig was injured and sent to Pai Hospital. The event occurred on January 6th, 2008. The NHRC has assigned the subcommittee for protecting human rights in the judicial system to investigate the case according to National Human Rights Commission Act 1998.  In investigating the facts, the subcommittee had the opinion that the testimony of individual witnesses at the court conflicted with facts from the police investigation, but were consistent with testimony from anonymous witnesses to the NHRC. It is thus credible that there has been a violation of human rights by state officers in the justice system, a matter in which the Canadian Embassy and the media has a special interest. As state officials are involved and the damaged party are foreigners, this has impacted international relations, and public order and decency. The investigation of this case requires gathering complex evidence requiring a special investigative method to gather evidence for the greatest justice for all parties concerned. After consideration, the NHRC has resolved to send the report of this investigation to the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) to take on as a Special Case, according to the Special Investigation Act 2004. Thus for your consideration to action, and for requests for results of the undertaking, NHRC will thank you greatly Sincerely  Mr Arinnapong Sutsukhon

Secretary General of the NHRC 

 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

Report on the Violation of Human Rights by National Human Rights Commission

Results report number 77/2551  Re: Rights in the justicial process in the case of Canadian tourists being shotComplainant: Case taken upComplainee: Police officers from Pai district Police Station, Mae Hong Son province.  Case taken up On Monday, 7 January, 2008, many media published news that Pol Corp Uthai Dechawiwat, a police officer from Pai district Police Station, Mae Hong Son province, had shot Canadian tourists with one dying and one injured. The event occurred on 6 January, 2008 on Highway 1095, Moo 8, Wiang Tai subdistrict, Pai district, Mae Hong Son province. The deceased was Mr Leo Delpinto aged 25, and the injured was Ms Carly Reisig, aged 24. Pol Corp Uthai claimed he heard the sound of the deceased and Ms Carly arguing and attempted to stop the situation by revealing himself as a policeman, but the deceased and Ms Carly turned on him. Pol Corp Uthai thus drew his gun to control the situation. The deceased tried to wrest the gun from him causing the gun to go off and the round to enter the body of the deceased and Ms Carly, who was severely injured. After considering the matter, the Office of the NHRC thus resolved to take up the case as Complaint No 39/2551 dated 11 January 2008, and assigned the subcommittee for protecting human rights in the judicial system to take action.  Investigation of the facts:   The subcommittee investigated the facts as follows: 

 1. On Wednesday 30 January, 2008 an (anonymous) witness testified to the subcommittee that on 6 January, 2008, the day of the incident, there had been an open-air musical performance at Reggae Place near the scene of the incident. There was playing around the bonfire until the music ended at about 0200 hours. The witness walked to eat rice soup at P.Dang shop, about 20 metres from the Ting Tong business. He saw Ms Carly walk with Mr Leo. At the same time, Mr Rattapon, a male friend of Ms Carly rode a motorcycle past them and turned around. The witness saw Mr Rattapon talk to Ms Carly. They were arguing and he heard loud shouting ending with the word “dog” (asking afterwards he found out Ms Carly was admonishing Mr Rattapon for not feeding a dog). Mr Rattapon was slapped hard on the face three times. Mr Rattapon thus turned to punch Ms Carly in the face once, and they fought until they both fell to the ground. Mr Leo thus pulled up Mr Rattapon and said “Stop”. During this, a man half-walked, half-ran from the direction of Pai Police Station wearing a sweat jacket and yellow shirt held a gun and said “you get down”. Mr Rattapon got down, Leo put his hands up. Ms Carly stood up, the man holding the gun used it to hit Ms Carly in the face and kicked her in the ribs. With Ms Carly doubled over, he fired a shot at Ms Carly. Ms Carly withdrew, holding her chest. Mr Leo called out, “stop please”. The man walked backwards and tripped on a motorcycle, making him bend over backwards. Mr Leo gave his hand for the man to get up. A shot came from the gun hitting Mr Leo in the stomach, causing Mr Leo to slump. The man fired another shot which hit him in the face. People saw the man walk away, and after a while the police arrived. Mr Rattapon took Ms Carly to Pai

Hospital, close to the scene. Nobody took Mr Leo to the Hospital. The witness thus borrowed a motorcycle and went to the hospital to get a doctor. Then the police came. Almost 20 spectators gathered and then disappeared. 2. Ms Carly Reisig testified to Mae Hong Son Court on 7 September that on the day of the incident, she and her male friend Mr Leo, who were staying in the same place, had been walking along the road to the Be-Bop shop for about 15 minutes when they met Mr Rattapon who was riding a motocycle past them. They asked Mr Rattapon to stop and asked him where he was going. Mr Rattapon replied that he was going home, and she asked whether he had given food to the dog named ‘Magic’. When she found out that Mr Rattapon had not yet fed her dog, she admonished him and they had a heated argument. The witness slapped Mr Rattapon hard on the face three times. Mr Rattapon was angry and punched the witness once in the face and they fought. Mr Leo came in to break them up by separating the witness and Mr Rattapon from each other. Then a man wearing a jacket and dark-coloured trousers ran up. The man kicked the witness in the ribs making her bend over. The man then drew a revolver and aimed it at her face. She pushed it out of the way. The man used the gun to hit her on the forehead once and then fired one shot into the area under her left breast. Mr Rattapon then came in to hold up the witness. The witness turned to look at the man and saw Mr Leo walking in slowly with both hands in the air, saying “Stop Stop Please!”. The man then walked backwards and tripped over a motorcycle making him bend over backwards. Mr Leo extended a hand to help him get up, but the man used the gun to fire two shots at Mr Leo. She saw Mr Leo holding his stomach and the man run away. Mr Rattapon then cried out for help, and Mr Rattapong took her on the motorcycle to Pai

Hospital, while Mr Leo was still lying on the floor. While she was being taken to hospital, the witness was conscious throughout, until doctors inserted a rubber tube into her wound, and the witness passed out, becoming conscious again when she was being moved to a hospital in Chiang Mai.
 

 3. Mr Rattapon Warewdee testified to Mae Hong Son Court on 7 September that on the day of the incident, he had ridden a motorcyle past Ms Carly and Mr Leo who were walking. Ms Carly called for him to stop. After that there was an argument with Ms Carly, the reason being that Ms Carly was angry that the witness had not fed her dog. Ms Carly than slapped him hard on the face three times. The witness was angry and thus got off the motorcycle and punched Ms Carly one time, and they had a fight. During the melee, Mr Leo had separated them. During this, a man of name unknown and previously not known to the witness ran up. The man walking out used his foot to kick Ms Carly in the ribs once. Ms Carly got up and  the man drew a gun, the type unclear, and aimed it at the face of Ms Carly. Ms Carly thus used her hand to push the gun out of the way. The man then used his gun to slap Ms Carly in the forehead once. Ms Carl slumped as she had been injured by the slap on the head. Then while Ms Carly was looking up, the man used the gun to fire one shot at Ms Carly. Seeing that he went in to hold up Ms Carly and saw that she had a gunshot wound under her left breast. During this, Mr Leo had walked towards the man, where Mr Leo had both hands in the air, while saying “Stop, Please stop!”. The man walked backwards and tripped over a motorcycle, causing him to bend over backwards. Mr Leo extended a hand to help him get up, but the man used the gun to fire two shots at Mr Leo. After that, he hurried to take Ms Carly on the motorcycle for treatment at Pai Hosital. As for Mr Leo, he was lying down at the scene of the incident and subsequently died. 

4. On 5 February, 2008, Dr. Khunying Porthip Rajanasanun inspected the body of Ms Carly and met the Head of the Department of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai

University, and the doctors, who conducted the post-mortem from the Faculty of Medicine,

Chiang

Mai

University, and received explanations and various still pictures concerning the death of Mr Leo. It was found that Mr Leo had been shot twice. One shot had hit the stomach and exited from the back, another shot went in at the cheek and penetrated under the armpit. The bullet hit vital places and made him die immediately. She gave the opinion that the characteristics of the shooting should not make it a case of the gun going off accidentally. 

5. The subcommittee met policemen at Pai Police Station in Mae Hong Son, and the policemen explained that it was an accident of the gun going off from a fight for the gun.  6. The subcommittee met the governor of Mae Hong Son and the Deputy Commissioner of Mae Hong Son police to state that police officers were carrying out investigation of the case.  Opinion of the subcommittee for protecting human rights in the judicial system The subcommittee, after consideration, had the opinion that facts from the testimony of witnesses at court, and the facts from the investigation were in conflict with that, where the testimony of individuals in the court were reasonably consistent with the anonymous witness at the scene testifying to the subcommittee. It is thus credible that there has been a violation of human rights by state officers in the judicial system, where this complaint is of interest to the Canadian embassy in Thailand and the media have been showing special interest in the case. It was thus seen as appropriate to refer the matter to the Department of Special Investiation (DSI), a neutral organization, for further action according to its powers, for the maximum justice of all parties. 

Resolution of the Office of the National Human Rights Commission The NHRC approved the resolution of the subcommittee at meeting number 4/2551 of the NHRC dated 14 February, 2008. 

Mr. Saneh Jamrik, President of the NHRC 

Miss Naiyana Suphapeung, Board of the NHRC 

 Mr. Pradit Charoen Thaithawee, Board of the NHRC

Mr. Wasan Panich, Board of the NHRC 

Mr. Suthin Noppaket, Board of the NHRC 

Mrs. Suni Chaiyaros, Board of the NHRC 

Mr.Surasi Kosolnavin, Board of the NHRC  Khunying Amporn Meesuk, Board of the NHRC  Miss Arporn Wongsang Board of the NHRC

Del Pinto’s death needs independent probe - says Thai Commission Feb 15 08

Last Updated: Friday, February 15, 2008 | 9:46 AM MT
CBC News

Thailand’s human rights commission has published a report suggesting Thai police botched their investigation into a Calgary man’s shooting death last month.

Leo Del Pinto, 24, (below) was shot and killed after an altercation with an off-duty Thai police officer in the northern town of Pai on Jan. 6.Leo Del Pinto03

His friend, Carly Reisig, was also shot and injured in the incident.

An internal police investigation found the police officer acted in self defence, but a report by the human rights commission released Friday refutes that claim.

“Thailand’s top forensic scientist stepped in and revealed categorically that when Leo Del Pinto was shot, he was shot from above,” reporter Andrew Drummond told CBC News from Bangkok.

“Somebody was shooting down into his head and that totally contradicts police evidence that says the policeman was falling back and he was being overpowered by the foreigner.”
Sgt. Uthai Dechawiwat re-enacted his role in the shooting for Thai investigators in January.Police SergeantUthai Dechawwiwat

The commission is asking the Thai prime minister for an independent probe by the justice ministry’s Department of Special Investigation.

“I spoke to the human rights commissioner today and essentially it looks like the police have backed down on the case. They’re no longer claiming it was an accident,” Drummond said.

Sgt. Uthai Dechawiwat (CBC picture right)has pleaded not guilty to murder and attempted murder. He said he was trying to break up a fight between Del Pinto and Reisig.

Carly11 Carly Reisig before giving evidenceBut Reisig told CBC News in January that the off-duty policeman punched her in the face as she and Del Pinto were leaving a restaurant and that her friend stepped in to defend her.

The commission has heard evidence from two local witnesses, backing Reisig’s account. They are being held in protective custody.

NB: Note. The witnesses are not in custody but their identities are being concealed prior to the trial and they are being looked after by the National Human Rights Commission.

From the family of Leo Del Pinto - gunned down by police in Thailand

Leo Del Pinto charcoalWe have been following the articles and news updates written by Andrew Drummond, along with reader comments through Letters to the Editor and various Thai blogs.  Some people are calling Andrew Drummond a ’sensationalist’, which could not be further from the truth.  The true sensationalists are the ones who are claiming there are no safety concerns for tourists in Thailand and try to pass this off as an “unfortunate incident”. The Del Pinto family has gone through a tragedy that no other family should experience. Andrew’s reporting along with the hard work the Canadian media has brought more truth and attention to this story than ever would have happened had it been left to the Thai government alone.  Some readers are claiming Carly Reisig has changed her story and her account of the incident has been inconsistent.  Having gone through official Thai documentation and written witness statements, it is the Thai police officer’s story that does not add up, and that is why the National Human Rights Commission is involved.  Our experience with the Pai police has been unpleasant to say the least and it is more than apparent they have attempted to protect “one of their own” at all costs.  It has taken the involvement of the DSI, National Thai Human Rights Commission and journalists such as Andrew Drummond to get any semblance of truth and justice in this case so far.  Andrew is not presenting a biased opinion, the facts are speaking for themselves; one innocent, unarmed Canadian was murdered in cold blood and another barely escaped with her life because of a reckless and aggressive off-duty police officer.  The ignorance of the reader’s who are outspoken against Andrew Drummond’s reporting will only lead to many more tourists being at risk in Thailand. 
 
- The Del Pinto Family
Calgary, Canada
———————————-
 
 
c/o Ross Fortune
Del Pinto Family Spokesperson
 

Pai shootings. Victim relocated after she loses all - February 9 2007

The National Human Rights Committee and DSI officials have relocated Canadian Carly Reisig, who was shot by a policeman in Pai last month after all her belongings were stolen, apparently when she was in hospital.Carly12 a Carly Reisig outside Mae Hong Son court

National Human Rights Commissioner Surasee Kosolnavin said he believed neither Reisig, from Chilliwack, B.C. or her boyfriend Rattaporn Varavadee, 36,  ‘Fune’ from Surin were safe to stay in the town after giving evidence to local police. They said they had hoped to say goodbye to friends.

“We moved her because we were concerned among other things that if she stayed her belongings could turn up at a later date with something illegal in them. This sort of thing has happened,” he said.

This followed an incident outside the prosecutor’s office in Mae Hong Son when Lt-Colonel Sombat Panya, head of the criticised police investigation approached Rattaporn.

Carly05 Police Colonel Sombat Panya approaches the witn

 Police Lt.-Col. Sombat Panya with Rattaporn (Fune) and

Carly outside Prosectors’ Office, Mae Hong Son

Carly 08 Rathapon Varavadee outside Mae Hong Son CourtRattaporn, who together with Ms Reisig, has claimed that the fatal shooting of Leo Del Pinto, 24, from Calgary, was murder, not an accident said: “He told me to go and see him in his office in Pai.  It’s not safe for me to go there. I have been imaging the variety of things which could happen to me.”

The National Human Rights Committee will meet Wednesday. They will rescue that the Department of Investigations takes over the investigation into the killing of Leo Del Pinto.

Shooting death - Police fabricated tale - Dr.Pornthip Feb 9 2008

SHOOTING DEATH
Police tale fabricated: Pornthip
NHRC wants DSI to take over Pai inquiry Published on February 9, 2008
Top forensic doctor Pornthip Rojanasunan has rejected the police account of the shooting of two Canadians, one of whom was killed, in the northern town of Pai last month.
Pornthip has been studying post mortems carried out both in Calgary, Canada and in Chiang Mai. She said this week that police claims that Leo del Pinto, 24, had been shot from below by a local policeman “as he was falling to the ground” did not match the evidence.

Carley Reising 01 with Dr  Pornthip Rojanasun 1
“What the police say is just not possible. Evidence shows that the gunman was above Leo when he was shot in the head,” she said at the Maharaj Chiang Mai hospital after studying medical records.

Picture: Carly Reisig with Dr. Pornthip and assistant to Canadian Honorary Consul in Chiang Mai
“One bullet went through his abdomen, piercing his kidney and liver, and the entry and exit points were at quite similar points. The bullet that entered the man’s head entered through his right cheek, went down through his larynx and was embedded under his shoulder,” she said.
Her comments add to a growing belief that the inquiry by local police into the incident is a sham, designed simply to get their colleague off the hook.
The National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) is set to formally request the Justice Ministry’s Department of Special Investigation (DSI) take over investigation into the shooting of del Pinto and Carly Reisig.
Rights Commissioner Surasee Kosolnavin, who has been looking into the case with the DSI’s Colonel Piyawate Kingkate and Pornthip, also indicated a range of concerns about the police probe.
“The most telling point of all is that police have given evidence that the bullet which hit Carly Reisig also hit Leo del Pinto. It is not possible,” said Commissioner Surasee. “So we are starting from that point and going back.Carley HRC Commissioner Surasee Kosolnavin

 Human Rights Commissioner Surasee Kosolnavin with NHRC team at  Pai police station

“There are reports that the policeman has been charged with murder and attempted murder, but no such charges have been brought. They have, however, now been put to the officer [at the court hearing on Wednesday] ,and we will be referring the case to the governing board of the DSI and recommend they take over the investigation.”
Prime Minister Samak Sundaravej may be asked to decide whether the DSI should take over the case, as the new PM is understood to head the committee that will consider the matter.
Reisig and del Pinto, both 24 and from British Columbia, were shot in the main street of Pai at about 2am on January 6.
Pai Police Sergeant Uthai Dechawiwat was freed without bail after admitting to shooting the two Canadians. He pleaded not guilty in Mae Hong Son Court on Wednesday to charges of murder and attempted murder.
But Uthai’s claims to have acted in self-defence after a fight erupted when he confronted the two tourists and that his gun discharged accidentally are contentious.
Reisig told the court on Wednesday she had been pistol-whipped then shot in the chest and that del Pinto had been fatally shot straight afterwards, despite having his hands in the air and pleading with Uthai to “Stop! Stop!”
Reisig’s account has been backed by two local witnesses, now in protective custody, who have given their account to the NHRC and DSI in Bangkok.

Andrew Drummond
Special to The Nation
Mae Hong Son
 

Canadian woman tells court of fatal shooting in Pai - Feb 8 2008

Damning new evidence has emerged in the case of two Canadians shot by a policeman in the northern town of Pai last month after two eye-witnesses to the drama sought protection from the National Human Rights Commission.
Carly08 Protected witnesses give evidence  to HR CommisThe witnesses, (pictured with Human Rights Commissioner Surasee Kosolnavin and DSI Colonel Piyawate Kingkate) a young man and woman from Chiang Mai, told the NHRC they were scared to give evidence to police in the North, so the commission helped them gave their account of the fatal shooting to officers from the Department of Special Investigation (DSI) in Bangkok.
The witnesses, who identities were not revealed, told the DSI that Sgt Uthai Dechawiwat had intervened while Carly Reisig was fighting her Thai boyfriend. The officer kicked Reisig, then hit her with his pistol, but she pushed it away, and he shot her in the chest.
He then shot her friend Leo Del Pinto, 24, twice.
They claimed del Pinto had his hands in the air and was yelling at the officer to “Stop! Stop!” They said Sgt Uthai was drunk.
The witnesses’ account is greatly at odds with the police report of the drama in the early hours of January 6. Sgt Uthai has claimed the two tourists attacked him after he confronted them about a fight and that his gun discharged accidentally.
News of the witnesses came out yesterday when Reisig, 24, went to Mae Hong Son Court to testify about the shootings. She was escorted to the court by officers from the DSI.
Sgt Uthai was summonsed to answer charges of murder and attempted murder. He pleaded not guilty to both.
Carly11 Carly Reisig before giving evidenceReisig told the court she was on the ground and had been fighting with her boyfriend Ratthapon because she said he had failed to feed her Labrador dog ‘Magic’. Leo had tried to separate the couple when a man she knew as Sgt Uthai approached.
“He came and kicked me in my side as I was trying to get up. He was shouting in Thai and pointing a gun at me. I pushed the gun away then he hit me over the head with the gun and I fell to my knees. As I fell he shot me just below the chest.
“I looked up and saw Leo was shouting ‘Stop! Stop!’ He had his hands in the air. The policeman fell back over a motorcycle then recovered and he fired twice.
After the first time Leo put his hands to his stomach and went down. Then he shot down at Leo as he fell.”
The new evidence had been gathered by a special team made up of members of the Human Rights Commission led by former public prosecutor Surasee Kosolnavin and officers of the DSI, under Colonel Piyawate Kingkate.
Commissioner Surasee said: “What is the most telling point of all is that police have give evidence that the bullet which hit Carly Reisig also hit Leo Del Pinto.  It is not possible. So we are starting from that point and going back.
“There are reports that the policeman had been charged with murder and attempted murder, but no such charges were placed. They have, however, been put to the officer today and we will be referring the case to the governing board of the DSI and recommend they take over the investigation.”
Also involved is Dr Pornthip Rojanasunan, Thailand’s top independent pathologist, who has been studying post mortems carried out in Calgary, Alberta and Chiang Mai. Dr Pornthip has already rejected police claims Leo Del Pinto was shot from below as he was falling to the ground.
“It’s just not possible, what the police say. Evidence shows that the gunman was above Leo when he was shot in the head.” she said at the Maharaj Chiang Mai hospital after studying medical records.
by Andrew Drummond
Special to The Nation
 

Either bullet would have killed Canadian backpacker - Jan 16 2008

From Andrew Drummond, Bangkok, January 16th

An autopsy carried out in Canada on the body of John Leo Del Pinto, who was gunned down by a policeman in Pai earlier this month has revealed both shots would have been fatal.Leo Del Pinto 01 1 2 3 4

The Medical Examiner’s office in Calgary, Aberta, has completed a report which says he was killed instantly by the bullet to his head. But the second shot pierced both his liver and kidney and would also have been fatal.

Ross Fortune, a spokesman for the Del Pinto family, said last night that personal belongings which Del Pinto was carrying at the time of the death had not been returned.

“This was heartbreaking news for a family, who are already struggling to cope with the loss of their only son.”

The full autopsy report is expected to be ready in three days.

A memorial service is to be held in Calgary today.

Meanwhile Canadian Secretary of State, Helena Guergis, has written to the Ministry of Foreign Affairs expressing Canada’s concern and asking to be kept up to date with the investigation into the shootings of Del Pinto and his companion Carly Reisig, 24, from Chilliwack, British Columbia as the country was concerned for the safety of its citizens in Thailand

Leo Del Pinto   Canada

Facts used to malign Canadian victim - Letter to the Nation -Jan 13 08

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Carly   Street seen in Pai today 1 2Last week The Nation newspaper published an account by myself in the aftermath of the shooting of two young Canadians in Chiang Mai.

This article included some of the history of Carly Reisig during her stay in Mae Hong Son’s Pai district.
This included the facts that she had hit a policeman in the past and had also been involved in some other fracas.
I included those facts because in the Thai context they could be relevant. I also had to ensure the story was even-handed. I was writing on the basis that Carly Reisig would be given a fair and level playing field.
I now of course realise that despite an extensive background covering similar cases in Thailand I was being rather optimistic, perhaps even naive.
While the facts presented were true, they have been wrongly taken in a malicious way by many, including “long-term resident expert foreigners”, as a reason to justify the attack on the two young Canadians.
As a journalist one is compelled to give both sides of the story. So I also included statements from witnesses interviewed by a colleague, who claimed Reisig started the fight.
What the journalist cannot convey sometimes is his opinion of whether the witnesses are telling the truth or show immediately what links these witnesses have to the police.Leo Del Pinto 01
I am reminded that no witnesses would go to court and testify that they saw Police Sergeant Somchai Wisetsingh shoot two British tourists dead in 2004. I am also reminded of the vicious stories put about concerning Vanessa Arscott.
I am very concerned at several aspects of this case:
1) The police claiming that Reisig was pregnant and this had angered a jealous foreign boyfriend.
2) The claims by the police shooter that he had been out of town before the shooting, when other witnesses were saying the officer was drinking heavily that night in Pai.
3) The threats to prosecute Reisig for assault on police.
4) The automatic bail for the police gunman.
5) The fact that local police are investigating themselves.
6) The claims that the gun had discharged three times accidentally.
Ms. Reisig has not asked me to apologise, nor would she, but I would like to tell Carly publicly that, having seen how this case is progressing, I am sorry for including facts which are being used against her and which after all have not helped her in what will by a very trying battle to come and which certainly do not give anyone justification for these atrocious shootings.
Andrew Drummond
Bangkok